Quote from: Haunebu on May 29, 2024, 02:40:59 PM

Quote from: Eternad on May 29, 2024, 02:07:42 PM

I’m curious about this case, why does only your casino make this match considered firmly as fixed match while other casino doesn’t make an annual like your for the same match. Can you provide proof that other casino marked this same match as highly suspicious as per your opening statement?

It's pretty damn obvious that almost all casinos would find these bets suspicious to be honest which is why proof isn't really required here. Betting on lower level leagues reduces your account health drastically in any sport.

Fairlay clearly pointed out the links in an organised manner which is why op is an a tough situation regardless of whether he was aware of the fixed matches or not. His chances of recovering his money are pretty slim in my opinion.

If this is really damn obvious then why will other casino still grade this match while only Fairlay don’t want to pay to the winning bets? Also there should be a news related to this match fixing if your opinion about being obvious is correct.

I agree that there might some anomaly on the match if you are viewing it as casino perspective since some players is doing shit performance at that match but this happened on other games which unnecessary foul on NBA being given like what happened when SGA foul Luca on their recent playoff match while they are already winning the game. I mean even a great player sometimes do obvious mistakes so this is possible on lower division team.

Fairlay is the only casino strongly claim that this game is match fix including you that’s why I’m asking if has proof that other casino share same opinion since he mention it already.