Quote from: serveria.com on Today at 07:00:22 PM

Quote from: Argoo on Today at 01:43:37 PM

At the same time, Ukraine’s allies admit that they are not doing enough to ensure that the Ukrainian Armed Forces have the opportunity to push the invaders out of their territory. Therefore, it is no coincidence that 11 states have already recognized Ukraine’s right to strike Russian military targets with their weapons. An opinion is also emerging that if Russia manages to achieve significant success on the Ukrainian front, then the army of European countries will be forced to openly help Ukraine defend itself from Russian aggression. Therefore, indeed, Russia’s continuation of the war with Ukraine increases the likelihood of direct military clashes with NATO.

If you haven't spotted already, Russia has already achieved significant success, by capturing numerous cities and almost completely destroying AFU. Russia vs NATO war means WW3 and eventually the nuclear apocalypse. Russia as a global nuclear superpower simply can't lose. Btw, not all NATO members are willing to fight Russia, for example Turkey announced they are not going to take part in any NATO offensive in Ukraine.

Quote from: Argoo on Today at 01:43:37 PM

Putin’s Russia still has a choice: continue military aggression against Ukraine and increase the likelihood of war with NATO, or gradually wind down military operations, admitting that the initial plans to seize Ukraine have completely failed. So far, we see that Russia is frivolously moving towards its own catastrophe with disintegration into several parts.

I'm not sure what Ukrainian trolls see, but I see that Russia is winning this war and AFU on the brink of complete collapse. Cool

If the Ukrainian Armed Forces have already been almost destroyed and they are on the verge of collapse, then the Russian occupiers will soon be in Kyiv? Or at least in Kharkov, which is located relatively close to the border with Russia? Taking into account the fact that the Russian army is now actively storming the Kharkov direction, then in a month or two Russian soldiers should at least capture Kharkov, right? But I think that even by the end of the year Russia will not be able to capture even Kharkov.

As for Russia’s possible war against NATO, everything depends on the aggressive appetites of Putin’s Russia. After all, Russia is currently attacking, not NATO countries. Russia, as a nuclear superpower, cannot lose a war? But the USA and France also have their own nuclear arsenals and then they also cannot lose?

NATO has not yet lost a single soldier in this confrontation. At the same time, Russia’s losses in manpower and military equipment are simply colossal. A few more years of such a war and NATO soldiers will be able to simply march and enter Moscow without any resistance.