Quote from: holydarkness on Today at 05:32:28 PM

Quote from: GluttonyY on Today at 03:36:43 PM

Quote from: holydarkness on Today at 09:53:14 AM

[...]
You missed my question about how two wrongs make a right.

This whole two wrongs make a right, is old terminology that does not apply to every situation.

There are some cases, when you are going to have to fight, and not fair, for an equal opportunity.

If you breaking the rules, is in virtue, of improving many peoples lives, then the rule needs to be broke.

Its fairly, simple. Life, is about different combinations.

In short, "I do that because PP do that first"?

Then on this case, I'll beg to challenge your opinion and that what yahoo said is indeed correct. Spamming the forum and breaking its rules with sole purpose to revolt against those who claimed your platform is scam [read: lashing out] is the textbook example of two wrongs fallacy.

Further, your decision to spam the forum just to retaliate does not only show signs of immaturity, which ultimately lead to questions your reputation, it is also pointless, in a sense that "no spamming" rule can still be hold intact while achieving the "virtue".

So, in this specific case, two wrongs does not make a right.

Quote from: GluttonyY on Today at 03:36:43 PM

Quote from: holydarkness on Today at 09:53:14 AM

So, you indirectly say that the seed is already there, people already questions the credibility of your system, with or without the "FUD" thrown at you?

Correct. Unlimited Money Generator, because of all the present scams, is enough to scare many away. This is fine, but with other users, supporting that narrative, it will never suffice.

Viewed from an angle of someone who are extremely sure his innovation is revolutionary and already invites a lot of attention [that he doesn't need this forum, because his platform already gather enough visitors from other platforms], it is rather pessimistic statement, is it not? Predeterminedly sure that other will be swayed and led to believe a narrative pushed by someone?

I don't think the two can coexist; the cocky attitude "I am a revolutionarist and here to bring salvation" and the pessimistic view of "the community will be scared and rather dubious to join due to all of the present scams and someone pushing a narrative." Either you're sure that your platform will flourish, that PP's statement doesn't matter, or you're rather unstable on your own two feet yet that you need all the support to help you flourish.

Quote from: holydarkness on Today at 05:32:28 PM

Quote from: GluttonyY on Today at 03:36:43 PM

Quote from: holydarkness on Today at 09:53:14 AM

[...]
You missed my question about how two wrongs make a right.

This whole two wrongs make a right, is old terminology that does not apply to every situation.

There are some cases, when you are going to have to fight, and not fair, for an equal opportunity.

If you breaking the rules, is in virtue, of improving many peoples lives, then the rule needs to be broke.

Its fairly, simple. Life, is about different combinations.

In short, "I do that because PP do that first"?

Then on this case, I'll beg to challenge your opinion and that what yahoo said is indeed correct. Spamming the forum and breaking its rules with sole purpose to revolt against those who claimed your platform is scam [read: lashing out] is the textbook example of two wrongs fallacy.

Further, your decision to spam the forum just to retaliate does not only show signs of immaturity, which ultimately lead to questions your reputation, it is also pointless, in a sense that "no spamming" rule can still be hold intact while achieving the "virtue".

So, in this specific case, two wrongs does not make a right.

Quote from: GluttonyY on Today at 03:36:43 PM

Quote from: holydarkness on Today at 09:53:14 AM

So, you indirectly say that the seed is already there, people already questions the credibility of your system, with or without the "FUD" thrown at you?

Correct. Unlimited Money Generator, because of all the present scams, is enough to scare many away. This is fine, but with other users, supporting that narrative, it will never suffice.

Viewed from an angle of someone who are extremely sure his innovation is revolutionary and already invites a lot of attention [that he doesn't need this forum, because his platform already gather enough visitors from other platforms], it is rather pessimistic statement, is it not? Predeterminedly sure that other will be swayed and led to believe a narrative pushed by someone?

I don't think the two can coexist; the cocky attitude "I am a revolutionarist and here to bring salvation" and the pessimistic view of "the community will be scared and rather dubious to join due to all of the present scams and someone pushing a narrative." Either you're sure that your platform will flourish, that PP's statement doesn't matter, or you're rather unstable on your own two feet yet that you need all the support to help you flourish.

Two wrongs, do make a right, if my platforms, are the industry standard, allowing users to gamble much more reliably and safer, while having the ability to easily profit.

Likewise, my platforms, will flourish without Bitcoin Talk Forum correct. But that doesn't mean dismiss the forum, this forum is very important.

It is not my sole goal, to make UMG, popular, but to stop users from gambling.

In virtue, to accomplish all my goals, I must achieve tasks on this forum, like disabling all of the casinos from generating revenue, as there is a much better safer way to gamble.

This forum, is a catalyst, for the gambling community. Which is why my presence here is important, no matter, if UMG, is popular or not.

I am an activist for gamblers right, and a pioneer for allowing gamblers to gamble without putting their livelihood at stake.

My sole goal, here is not just to profit, but provide a platform, where users can profit while gambling, and profit with little to no resources.

Likewise, while disabling the platforms designed to do the opposite, ability to flourish.

I must express the importance of UMG, and in order to express my intentions are pure, I must set fire to the doubters, and explain to everyone why what they are doing is wrong, and it is going against, the positive future for gamblers. I do this by spamming, and setting up trials.

Two wrongs do make a right in this case.

Likewise, I am 21 years, old, with no social life.

Of course I am immature, the only thing that matters is that all of my claims are true, and that I allow you to get your money in and out of UMG.

The rest will follow later.

But I think expecting, a 21 year old, to be mature all the time is unrealistic.

And you would much rather a 21 year old, who is forthcoming, and honest about their desire and intentions.

What 21 year old, do you know that can initialize, two platforms, as I have in less than 7 months, one being a crypto currency exchange, the other being a platform, globally used in the future, by millions of people looking to generate revenue.

This is only that of someone capable to be leading, the innovation, in my opinion. Likewise, there are no questions about my legitimacy, we know I am legitimate. If I was not, then users would have told you already. Users play UMG, they win money, some withdraw, some keep playing until luck is not on their side.

Quote

Then on this case, I'll beg to challenge your opinion and that what yahoo said is indeed correct. Spamming the forum and breaking its rules with sole purpose to revolt against those who claimed your platform is scam [read: lashing out] is the textbook example of two wrongs fallacy.

Like I said, two wrongs make a right, in virtue of setting the balance so something correct can happen.

In this, case these users comments, must be pester sized, so users do not fall into this fallacy that UMG, is a scam or a scheme.

Likewise, I am sure, UMG will flourish, this is not a doubt to me. I am still coherent on that factor, the main, point here is to stop gamblers, from using casinos.

Furthermore, you see my name is Gluttony.

Even if my platform is flourishing, with just traders.

I want the gamblers too.

Because my platform helps gamblers, to the extreme. I am aware of all these factors, and this is what gets me out of bed in the morning.

Getting farther than I did the last day.

My spam is needed, I am cognitive enough to know that.

a 99.9% RTP system, helping you to win, users calling this a scam.

This cannot go unnoticed.