Yeah that's a very good point. Nowadays as people have became so materialistic thats why they just see the beautiful branding of the projects and that's enough to make them to invest in that project. It shouldn't be like that due this the good projects which can't afford heavy brandings are made aside.
Fundamentals is the most important aspect that should be looked after in order to make the investments so that the people who doesn't the positive work can be appreciated.
Just like they say “do not judge a book by its cover”. Some projects may look too simple but its utility is what matters the most. We need to review those intently instead of just basing on what looks good and what doesn’t look good.
As long as it can be used properly, its interface wouldn’t matter too much. Of course it could be improved but you have to consider that just because it’s not as advanced as others it means that it’s a bad project already.
Correct, and it's how we can used a project in real life, not just for aesthetics or simply put, for pure hype and pump and dump coins. And I think investors are getting smart now, they really look for the coin/site or project and what it can bring in the table for them not just for the profit itself.
But there are projects that are really design by developers to be like this, I mean p&d and after that, they will left the project dead and then be de-listed by exchanges. And the thing is that the crypto space is already saturated, so we should really be careful of selecting which project to invest and what utility they can offer and be used by us.