I have a slightly different idea, Haaland is not the key factor that helped Man City win the championship. Erling Haaland is a small player in a big match, he always fails in the final.
Small player? Always failed in final?It is funny to see your comment, dude.
Do you conclude everything based on the FA Cup final only?
It is weird.
They are probably trying to say in general for Haaland. They are right about it as well. Haaland really messes up in big matches most of the time. You must have watched many examples in various competitions so far.
This doesn't mean Haaland is a bad player of course. He is still scoring like a machine. However he is criticized with that negative side of him recently and he will continue to be if he doesn't get better in big matches. Maybe you will say he doesn't get the ball very often in such matches. However he can still create a formula for that like helping his teammates create big goal opportunities. If he does that he is really going to be a complete forward.
