Quote from: Beparanf on Today at 01:52:34 PM

^ your aggressive behavior towards other user while you are consistently trying to taint casino reputation over your speculation about scam makes you received negative feedback.

Quote from: Maasdamer on Today at 01:39:54 PM

BC is a scam site, I just lost another 30:4 games in a 34 throws on dice, on a 52% win chance. 35:8, yeah right.
Lose 12, win 3, lose 5, win 2, lose 10, win 2, lose 3, win 1 and then lose the last 1.
Every 2nd session I lose 80% or more bets with over 50% win chance, the other sessions I lose at least 60%.
Losing 10 and 12 in a row withing 1 minute is mathmatically crazy. Over 1000:1 and 4000:1 chance of losing like this, within 90 seconds. And it happens every single session. How do you explain that?

You need to have more sample size in able to conclude that the result was rigged. Because you can experience the opposite result on your next sample size if you continue playing.

Your data looks like a bad luck result only given that it only involves 34 throws. I believe you are just making it a big deal because you bet huge amount our of that 34 throws.

Losing players always blame the site first. It would be so easy to just quit if you have suspicions over gameplay, but many that make these accusations always come back for some reason.
I also stopped playing at several sites in the past, even at stake over their hilarious casino outcomes and terrible sports odds.

Honestly, I also believe site manipulate games. I have some experience and between real life casinos and online the difference in horrendous runs ( pro casino ) really is staggering. Never had I ever lost more than 8 or 10 BJ hands in a row in a real casino, at stake once I lost 15 in a row and 21 of 23 ( plus some draws ) . Sure it might be "unlucky" but at stake at their originals I have never had a winning session , win/lose wise, if the session had more than 100 deals or throws.

I have made screenshot of my worst starts, it's so sad to look at them but they are a reminder of how bs these games are.
Just a small sample of starts into sessions:

Win / Lose

4/14
10/23
0/8
1/12
4/19
6/17
10/26
11/23
13/29
13/35
16/37

Starting sessions like this instantly breaks you. People and sites always talk about small sample sizes but how can you get a high sample size if you start like this.

Sometimes ( but really very rare ) I won at the start and managed to quit while I was ahead but playing a longer session it always ended up outside of the actual winning % as it is advertised. Dice and BJ really are the worst, even if you choose a high winning % the actual outcome is far away from that.

My advise at OP, stop playing and stop freaking out in this forum, it won't change anything.