Re: Potential Match Fixing involving Finnish teams FC Futura and Ilves-Kissat
This is the scary part TBH. Seeing how they behaved here and which arguments they used/defended, you'd think they are just starting with their business.
Yeah. They did embarass themselves for sure by going back on their own words just because they didn't with certain viewpoints. They definitely aren't a scam site, but they will lose punters with those sort of behaviour.If they are really here for 10+ years, they should know better than to say 'ooh, this looks fixed'. The lack of understanding of sports for a sports bookie is baffling as well.
Their evidence did it make it look like some of those matches were fixed though and they are a sports betting exchange(Not a bookie).You are one person that understands Fairlay. One thread doesn’t define 10 years of payouts. They are the only casino/book/ sports exchange that supported hard forks, their payouts are almost immediate. They have $52m in their cold storage. I didn’t start posting in this thread until page 7 other than mentioning holydarkness. I did this to give myself time to research even though I’ve been there 10 years.
Their negatives are that they have the worst UI of all books. They have one case that needs to be cleaned up.
Let`s keep it real, they seriously shared some instagram posts stating something like "There`s a market selling fixed matches and team X is mentioned often"... 
I think you should look more in to Fairlay. No one that plays at Fairlay would call them a scam. They aren’t one of the crypto books here that keeps stealing money for multi-accounting and jurisdiction. If they clean up the UI and take care of the fixed match, they would be the number 1 crypto sportsbook/exchange. They could be a mix of Pinny and BetFair.
Even now as is, no one can name a safer book.
Read again what I wrote and please comment on that - I did not say anything related to your response to me.
So did they share the ridiculous instagram bs or not?
Read again what I wrote and please comment on that - I did not say anything related to your response to me.
That user as I mentioned earlier has been trying to whitewash their (fairlay) image, and he's replies has had striking similarities with the final message the official fairlay account made here;We are very sorry to see, that reputable members of this community like efialtis and others immediately take side of some random (potentially criminal) guy over a business, that has a 10-year track record of serving all customers well and fairly.
Rating Place has ignored all of the comments here, solely focusing on their record of safety and wanting to draw users into a competition of which website is the safest, as if any of that should have importance in this isolated case.
Safety is a major part of the thread. People have 3 red tags on Fairlay that are unwarranted.