Quote from: Yxuyovysis384 on June 17, 2024, 10:08:26 PM

1. Drhouse99 had very similar situation. That's why I took his/her post as example. Perhaps we had a bet on the same event or outcome and all bettors on that event were considered "abusers".Which, of course, is unlikely. I'm more inclined to believe that duckdice periodically just doesn't pay out winnings, as the blocking happened exactly after the request for winnings.
2. "similar usernames" : You don't choose your username by yourself. Duckdice generates it randomly after registration.
3."Usually the user reads only the first post, but you took the next one as an example." An ironclad argument. No comment.

The post was written for the purpose of contacting the administration. If duckdice had linked my account and Drhouse99's account, they would have mentioned it in the beginning and would have attached proof, but this way they just decided to get caught up in a typo in the text.
Also, the reason I chose this forum to write this post is because of the direct link on the duckdice site. I thought I could get some help in resolving the conflict here.
I have no time or desire to argue with anyone. I just want my money.

It's not just a matter of typo and forgetting to remove a copied part. From their side, they confirmed that their detection system [both by them and the one by their sports provider] caught similarities. And if we suppose that they "made up" those statement [which can be proven rather easily on a 3rd party mediator], the findings made on the forum rather points out to that possibility as quite likely.

But let's amuse a benefit of doubt for a second. Judging from your explanation number 3, it can be inferred that the result you get is roughly similar with what I displayed on post #28, that the case by drhouse99 was not on the first result. Interestingly, the post being displayed was not the one by OP, it's a reply made by someone else. So, at glance, you wouldn't know what's the case is about.

In order to learn about it, you have to click it open. From this, there are two possibilities. One, you skipped the first entry entirely, and that'll bring us to a question: why? Or two, you read the first one, ignored it although it has a better format and detailed information, and choose to copy a wall of text, which brings us to a question: why?

And here's another why: you go to the forum and use their search feature instead of utilizing search engine like common people do?