Quote from: holydarkness on Today at 04:05:18 PM

Quote from: amazingseller1 on Today at 10:37:20 AM

I didn't expect a normal reply from you guys either , I asked for a loan it was stupid alright !! move on

how I can remove them and never do that mistake again ?!

Explained right above your post.

Quote from: Helena Yu on Today at 01:34:50 PM

It's a sarcasm, but after I think it for few times, actually it still has a point.

What do you think for @OP who received 4 negative feedback can convince them to withdraw their feedback? obviously proving if he's not a scammer and want to change to be better person, but:

1. He's high unlikely able to build reputation since many users refrain to meriting red tagged user.
2. Offering service, escrow or become campaign manager, no one gonna hire/work with red tagged user.
3. Showing good act for catching scammer or abuser, many users will judge him isn't genuine.

Now, how?

Now I am honestly confused.

On previous post, I can get the hint of satiric response, though I prefer to take it literally due to the possibility that if we amuse the idea to an OP that seemingly very gullible, not clarified and straightened, it poses a risk to cast a wrong impression to the DT system, that he'll led to think that DT and their feedback can be exchanged for some amount of fund; not necessarily 1.3BTC, if OP took this idea and believe it's true, he'll probably "negotiate" a lower number, or leave immediately with an assumption that DT can really be bought. In other word: read the room before you throw the sarcastic retort, mull over how possible is it for gullibles to take your word literally.

And here you're saying that you think for it a for a few times and insist that though it's originally intended to be a sarcastic retort, it still has a point. Thus, you're now being sincere with the suggestion, because with 4 negative feedback, there is no other way for OP [due to the three points you raised, though I'd like to argue that point number 3 is actually still a possible path to take] to get it removed other than paying?

Your words, and if you argue and try to get away with it by saying that you're still being sarcastic, maybe because the implication of what you suggested finally dawned to you, the wording you made, "It's a sarcasm, but after I think it for few times, actually it still has a point" points to a possibility that you believe the idea you offered actually have a merit, further stressed with the closing words that you ask "how", how can OP exactly get his negative feedback removed, other than with the method you suggested.

This is where I circled back to the part where point number 3 is still a possible path. If OP contributes to the forum, it doesn't close to a possibility that the negative feedback will eventually be removed as people begin to trust him. Catching scammers or abusers hint that his post will be made on scam accusations board, the one that runs on evidences. If he can provide undeniable evidence, would you think readers and the DT judge that he isn't genuine?

Another one, as suggested by other, which if I may be honest, I am not really favoring it: create a whole new account. Start fresh, his account basically has nothing to lose, it can be disposed and he can create a new one with more understanding of what he should and should not say, what's the acceptable terms in lending section, and what's frowned by the forum. It's certainly way better than suggesting to pay the DT, an idea that come from your sarcasm and you find rather valid after thinking about it for a few times.

I'll suggest you to drop this topic before you go further down the rabbit hole.

Quote from: KingsDen on Today at 03:13:57 PM

LOL.
I'm surprised you didn't pick the sarcasm behind the post. It was same 1.3 BTC Op was requesting for a loan that Helena Yu told him to give the DTs that left him the tag Grin

It came to my mind, as I previously stated, but I can't help but also consider the possible scenario that occur due to the post, which also explained on previous post. And I choose to take the risk of an err, giving it a chance to be clarified, rather than let OP believe DT can be bought.

In retrospect, though, I think the best approach will be to write, "OP, in case you missed it, that suggestion is a sarcasm."

Finally true reply , thank you so much