Your "advice" of buying because we are currently below it is based on wishful thinking and extremely biased interpretation of the data.
Same advice I would give, because 99.99% of all humans have a time horizon that extends beyond the current week, and don't watch charts every day, let alone all day.
It looks really bad for you, this mocking contempt for maturity, realism, and rationality. I wouldn't want to play poker with that much drama, personally. But then I never really took to reality TV either.
I find it hard to imagine how you can consider it anything but dispassionately objective to note that the historic trend is still holding, and therefore can be expected to continue to hold, until it ceases to hold.
This is a remarkably incoherent post for you. Guess the nerves of the hodlers are wearing thin at the moment.
>I find it hard to imagine how you can consider it anything but dispassionately objective to note that the historic trend is still holding
Who said anything about the "historic trend [not] holding"? I certainly didn't.
I simply reject the pathetically transparent attempt to turn the historic trend into something that it isn't, which is pretending that it is: (a) a guarantee that it will continue to grow like that, and (b) even when assuming point a) holds, that we see a continuation of growth *now*(ish).
Neither of the two points is a consequence of the historic trend analysis (how could it?), but it is regularly presented as such. Hence: snake oil sales talk.