Quote from: escrow.ms on April 27, 2014, 05:27:23 PM

Quote from: TheMightyX on April 24, 2014, 05:40:40 AM

I will have to agree. Anon and escrow.ms you might be turning some people away with your requiring private keys. Some people are noobs and don't understand how things work. It's also a moot point, because we are not talking about shitloads of money per person here. So the chances of someone hacking their bitcointalk account just for that .1 to 2 BTC is rather low.

Requiring a PM with the tx id and a receiving wallet address should be more than enough security.
You could also let people opt-in to withdrawal only by private key proof. That way those who are investing more can choose a hightened security (and pay a higher fee).

You might consider adjusting your terms.

I never said It's a mandatory requirement, you can check my other IPO's Most investors didn't sent any keys to me, If it's hard use can send funds and ask escrow provider about it. But I will sure remove that requirement from future escrow upon one condition which is, if user wants refund he need to prove that he sent those funds from his wallet.

Most escrow providers encourage users to send funds from their own wallet due to security and for refund process. (Ie: If some investors account got hacked, he can simply ask escrow provide to give refund on different address)

In this IPO,I think main issue was fees.. (Anon136, please don't mind) which was..

Quote from: Anon136 on April 26, 2014, 02:09:51 PM

My fees are 0.02BTC or 0.9% which ever is greater and it will be taken off the top when ever i release or refund those coins.

If some investor wants to send 0.1 btc, 0.02 BTC is too much.
https://blockchain.info/address/1KFtdiVELBcaVtaueqf8RJBkoZnjHbshKA

That's how much I value my time. The amount they send doesn't effect the amount of time it takes to process their order and handle the necessary customer service and it doesn't change how much I value my time.