Quote from: pbies on June 26, 2024, 06:06:58 PM

Quote from: JayJuanGee on June 26, 2024, 05:52:42 PM

Quote from: pbies on May 25, 2024, 09:38:36 PM

Why I am offended and offender post is not removed?

My defending answer to his post was removed, but his insults not.

WTF is this?

Why double standards?

Why no reference link or better description in regards to what you are talking about (referring to)?

I am having trouble to have enough context from your description - not that I am going to know the answer.. but at least if you present the facts a wee bit better, then at least, there might be some ability to attempt to analyze the matter and to figure out if you might have had been treated unfairly and/or disparately, as you are claiming.
...

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5497317.msg64127027#msg64127027
Clearly Legendary user Stalker22 is insulting me. I only made reaction to his insulting, which was removed.

This is clearly unfair, his post should be removed and user should be blocked for one month time from posting.

And in any way you should blame me for my reaction where he was first to insult me. Remove the cause, not the effect.

Personally, I am probably not going to be any good on this one, since I read through your linked thread, and I likely do not understand the topic enough to see the extent to which you might be raising any valid issues, and surely, as Stalker22 pointed out, you can likely recognize that you had been using a bit of drama (or wanting to get some reaction) by both suggesting the "end of bitcoin," and also "let the shitstorm begin" which reasonably could cause others to question your genuineness and even post hostily towards your ideas.

I might even post hostily towards your ideas if I were to understand the technical aspects well enough to get worked up about it... so sometimes a bit of personal insult might be justified if members consider other members to be trolling and/or not genuine.. which might be a kind of escalating that has been taking place between you and Stalker22 -including that sometimes forum admins will delete the posts of both members, but other times they might not delete both sides of an argument since all posts are not equal.. so if you consider that they are deleting merely on a one-sided basis, that usually would not be the case, and I would need to see more evidence of that kind of an assertion to just accept what you are saying. Maybe you would need to show the post that was deleted to the extent that might help, or not?

I will say that I have had some posts deleted in the past, and sometimes I thought that the deletion of my post(s) was not fair, but sometimes I can see that there might not have had been very much helpful information in my post that had ended up getting deleted, and maybe sometimes the post ends up getting deleted because the back and forth had gotten into some kind of not very helpful territories.

I think overall forum admins attempt to error on the side of not deleting posts if there might be some actual value in some of the posts besides merely back and forth personal battles.... so maybe the post of yours that ended up getting deleted might NOT have had any substantive value contained therein, yet the post of Stalker22 had some substantive value. You did not say what the deleted post of yours stated..; so in some sense, not all posts are equal.. even if we might consider that Stalker22 might have had some overreactive aspects contained within one or more of his posts that did not end up getting deleted by admins (I doubt that mere insults would be enough to delete posts, but if the ONLY thing that you are doing is insulting, then that might be enough to get your post deleted).

Your specific recommendation of a kind of suspension of Stalker22 for one month seems a bit much, and I would likely need to see more information if there was evidence to support that, and of course, you could make that kind of a report and recommendation to admin or even create a thread on the topic if you believe you have enough evidence to support your claim.... even though surely I don't necessarily want to get involved, since I already claimed to not really know what is the issue, and I am not even much clearer about the situation based on your so far providing of evidence.

Quote from: Stalker22 on June 26, 2024, 08:21:13 PM

Quote from: pbies on May 25, 2024, 09:32:12 PM

Don't be so frustrated little kid, there will come a day for you also.

Some might find this comment offensive. Even threatening. Not me, though. I find it amusing. Especially since you locked the topic right after. Like a scared little bitch. Cheesy

Yeah.. threats would be against the rules, even though sometimes the content or the context of the alleged threat is not clear enough in the above example to be read as a threat... but sometimes admins could have a different interpretations of the same words. I recall one time reporting a member's post that I had perceived to be a threat, but the admin did not perceive that post to be a threat, and so after a few weeks or even a few months, there was not even any repeated interactions in that same direction between myself and that other member, so even my perception of what that other member had said earlier was no longer even in my head as a threat.. .. even though I still believe that there was a bit of a threatening element within the post that had gone overboard.. and so sometimes there can be differing interpretations of something like a threat..