Quote from: stompix on July 09, 2024, 01:10:38 PM

Quote from: BlackHatCoiner on July 09, 2024, 08:54:23 AM

Besides what garlonicon said about the philosophy behind BSV, have you actually attempted to sync a BSV node? I don't know man, you might... be surprised. Grin

So, did it break?
The tweet says only something about economically feasible, 2022! , we are in 2024 and BSV chain still works despite all the mumbo jumbo about intergalactic CPUs needed to run it!

If you only care about whether it break, then you might as well as use Solana as comparison. Old estimation on https://solana.stackexchange.com/a/989 shows all TX already in tens of TB, while storage for running it's archival node already in hundreds of TB.

Quote from: stompix on July 09, 2024, 01:10:38 PM

Nobody here actually answers this:
What would be the technical restraints and how much more would cost a user in 10 years if the chain would move from 1vMB to 8vMB assuming all blocks would be full? If anyone thinks it's not possible show me the numbers!!!!

The concern isn't technical restraints, but rather cost to run full node and IBD duration. And personally i feel 8 vMB is fine with today's hardware (excluding SBC such as Raspberry Pi 4).

Quote from: BlackHatCoiner on July 09, 2024, 06:46:57 PM

Quote from: stompix on July 09, 2024, 01:10:38 PM

What would be the technical restraints and how much more would cost a user in 10 years if the chain would move from 1vMB to 8vMB assuming all blocks would be full? If anyone thinks it's not possible show me the numbers!!!!

You mean from 4 vMB to 8 vMB? The block size is not 1 MB, this is 2024!

As reminder, vMB and MB are 2 different unit. Maximum block size is 1 vMB or 4 million weight unit, where theoretically a block can reach almost 4MB in size.