Quote from: cabron on July 20, 2024, 07:22:45 PM

Quote from: Kavelj22 on July 20, 2024, 06:50:59 PM

Quote from: bbc.reporter on June 11, 2024, 05:27:12 AM

Also, why would you blame Hamas? Blame the reaction of the Biden administration. They are sending billions in Ukraine and Israel while the people in their country are going through financial hardships? This is very head shaking.

Good question. I was having a discussion on one of the platforms about this topic and thought it would be useful to share some thoughts here.

Regarding the American position on the war in Gaza and the rate of change after the presidential elections, it is noticeable that there is not much hope that Trump will contribute to salvaging the situation a little if he wins the elections, because we have not witnessed a change in the American policy that is absolutely supportive of Israel since its declaration as a state. But Trump can use this war as a pressure card in the elections to mobilize more voters, especially those who oppose the war, as Biden cannot deny his policy of supporting Israel.
Amid his electoral battle, Trump seemed contradictory in his statements. During an interview he gave to Fox News early last March, he expressed his support for the war launched by Israel on the Gaza Strip, only to return later, at the end of the same month, and say that Israel is losing international support and must end the war. But what is noteworthy is that Trump's few statements on this matter have sometimes been against the war, or rather against the Netanyahu government, while the White House was moving to persuade Israel to reach a solution to stop the war.
In fact, Trump has revealed little about his views on the Gaza war, from the possibility of a ceasefire to what might happen when the fighting stops. In his statements, Trump always links Israel's right to defend itself with his talk about peace in the region, but his campaign team does not yet see any reason for him to greatly address the war in Gaza, despite the decline in support among Democrats for Biden due to his strongly supportive position. to Israel and its failure to achieve a ceasefire.

This is not the kind of thought to first come to mind with his choice of a vice president who cares about war even in Asia. If Vance is leaning toward suppressing China as a rising empire then NATO is with him especially when NATO is trying to expand members from Asia.

This only makes the US not so united when its President is anti-war and his vice is pro-war. This is the kind of scenario in the 3rd world countries.

This confirms my position on what I see. There is a duality in Trump's speech that can only be explained within the framework of his electoral campaign to garner the largest possible number of votes. We know very well that the popular position does not completely agree with the position of the American administration, and there is popular pressure on the administration to stop supporting Israel and speed up finding a solution between the two parties to the conflict, and this is the point that Trump uses as if he supports the popular position until reaching power. Whether Trump or all members of his administration will not be against Israel or stop support, but they need double standards during the electoral stage. The same applies to crypto support.