Quote from: anarkiboy on July 24, 2024, 10:16:08 AM

Quote from: ABCbits on July 24, 2024, 10:13:20 AM

Some example,
1. Anyone (such as exchange) who become victim of their double-spend attack.
2. If the attack performed by company who own mining pool, miner theoretically can sue them for misuse of their hashrate.

This are good examples but we all know how law suits stand against Chinese owned companies, they will not care.

You mentioned OFAC on previous posts, which means you should already know some of those company ocated in US (rather than China).

Quote from: anarkiboy on July 24, 2024, 06:05:11 PM

Quote from: graphite on July 24, 2024, 05:51:05 PM

--snip--

Since you don't have much knowledge this calculations may seem logical to you but it's not that cheap to attack Monero and it's impossible to rent that kind of hashing power (AWS and other services don't even allow mining) and nicehash which is the biggest provider wouldn't even scratch the surface of Monero.

FYI many service don't care whether you perform mining or other task which use 100% CPU, as long as you rent dedicated server. Only few provider (such as Hetzner) which explicitly forbid any cryptocurrency application on their server. And looking at https://www.nicehash.com/my/marketplace/RANDOMXMONERO, it's true it's far from enough to perform 51% attack.