Quote from: milewilda on Today at 07:30:27 AM

Quote from: delfastTions on July 25, 2024, 02:32:57 PM

Quote from: EarnOnVictor on July 25, 2024, 08:58:48 AM

Quote from: delfastTions on July 24, 2024, 05:14:35 PM

Quote from: EarnOnVictor on July 24, 2024, 10:41:12 AM

~ snip ~

On the other hand, if we are talking about casinos that are initially perceived by players as reliable and proven over the years in the market, then the accusations against such casinos are usually not sufficiently substantiated. I talked about user reviews accusing well-known and large casinos of somehow deceiving the player who is complaining.
Accusations against fraudulent casinos may of course be fair, this is obvious. And in this case, the 10/90% ratio will certainly not be fair. But let’s also take into account that in negative reviews and accusations from users there is often an intent to create a negative image of a particular casino. And from the practice of such individual opinions, even if they are custom-made, it is clear that this is a fairly strong advertising message.
Naturally, competitors use such methods of anti-advertising. And such pre-prepared and paid for, one might say, custom-made versions of accusations against the casino should also be taken into account.

I see, I just understood what you are saying, it seems there was a misunderstanding between the direct accusation of cheating/fraud by individuals and that of a normal review of a casino. However, I've been so particular about reviews and I do not take individual reviews for granted, but the exception is that I read them insightfully and make sure that I average the general claims. For example, if I read 100 reviews, I might welcome just 60 of them as some might have ingenuine underdone, which means that my judgement about that casino will be based on 60% (whether positive or negetive) regardless of how they paint the casino.

I do this because there are also bad actors that are paid by a rival company or just wanted to cause issues due to their ugliness, and because there are casinos that will pay people to spread goodness about them. Irrespective of that, if it's a direct allegation on any casino, I will always be netrual at first with the both party and will never believe a casinos can't do it like many would assume just because they are reputed. I am only open to contructive defence by them.

The fact that you approach your own analysis so carefully and thoroughly of the real state of affairs in the work of some casino about which you read reviews, testimonials or complaints from players, clearly indicates that you approach this issue very correctly and competently. This is definitely something to welcome and praise you for.
But in general, it is sometimes simply impossible for truly inexperienced players to understand the essence of what is happening because they simply cannot distinguish the flow of fake, false information from what is actually happening.

This is generally a global problem for the Internet as a whole, and I even sometimes think that the nascent AI most likely will not understand the real picture of the world at all and will present us all with an image of the future in some wild and ethereal form.
By the way, this could soon become a big problem for the entire civilization.

Or simply making up some research first before involving wont really be costing you an arm and leg on which it would really be just that not that too hard on doing so. It is really just that there are people who do make out some rush decisions as if they would really be missing out something. If we do really tend to look at on the current market and the reputation of those websites or platforms then it wont really be that too hard to determine on which one is good and which one is bad. You would really be choosing up according into your own preference and choice. Accusations would be thrown or would really be that raised up wont really be that directly be concluded to be legit. Just like the rest been saying that on the moment that issues been raised then the community would really be verifying everything.

They wont really be that easily be having that one sided on which everything should be cleared out.If found guilty then they would really be having that negative trust and the entire
community wont really be recommending such platforms. Its not really that hard to distinguish on which one is legit and which one is really that having pending
issues or simply not that a good reputation.

Of course, if one or more times the community of all casino gambling players discovers that some casino was clearly in the wrong in its relationship with a client and somehow treated him unfairly, then this will certainly lead to a deterioration in the casino’s image and, accordingly, to an outflow of clients. Therefore, in my opinion, many serious casinos still strive to ensure that their disputes with clients do not go beyond personal negotiations and do not become the subject of public discussion. However, angry customers still raise scandalous issues about the casino into public discussion, and this has a serious impact on the overall image of the casino.
The task of casino support, it seems to me, is precisely to ensure that as few of such scandalous problems as possible go beyond personal communication with the client. This is one of the indicators, by the way, of the quality work of casino support.