Quote from: holydarkness on Today at 04:34:59 PM

Quote from: Rating Place on August 02, 2024, 05:20:27 PM

Quote from: holydarkness on August 02, 2024, 04:12:14 PM

Umm... I don't think there is much that a casino can do, any casino, when the root of the situation is their provider inquiring for investigation. They have to comply to this and their hands are as tied as the players. So, basically, the situation with providers can happen to any casino, and it's quite unfair to make the casino [again, any casino] bear the burden for it.

The casino isn’t required to hold the player’s money. The casino has chosen to hold the player’s money. The ultimate decision on whether to pay or not, when under provider review, is always determined by the casino.

How? Doesn't a profit earned from a winning wager that's forfeited should be returned to the provider once the provider deemed the wager is wrong? If a casino release the fund prior to a ruling by the provider, and the player withdrawn the fund, wouldn't that mean the casino should pay the fund that's supposed to be returned to the provider from their own pocket?

Quote from: BitcoinGirl.Club on Today at 03:10:23 PM

Quote from: holydarkness on August 02, 2024, 04:12:14 PM

Umm... I don't think there is much that a casino can do, any casino, when the root of the situation is their provider inquiring for investigation. They have to comply to this and their hands are as tied as the players. So, basically, the situation with providers can happen to any casino, and it's quite unfair to make the casino [again, any casino] bear the burden for it.

The only way to fix it is to cancel the deal with the provider if the casino think the provider is not allowing them to do their [casino brands] business. When the reputation will be lost then the casino will loss it not the provider. I do not think giving the blame to the provider also justify the loss of the players.

I don't think it's the case where a provider doesn't allow a casino to do business, it's more like the provider needed to take a deeper look into the betting activity to rule out any possibility of foul play. If a casino cancel a deal with provider every time provider asks for investigation, I don't think there will be much game can be played on that casino.

This is just like the Fairlay case. I tell you something over and over again and it’s not sinking in. The provider has nothing to do with the money. All money transfers are between the player and casino.