Quote from: Wind_FURY on August 05, 2024, 05:25:58 AM

Quote from: Kavelj22 on August 03, 2024, 05:27:47 PM

According to my relatively long experience here on the forum, more than 90% of the accusation topics that are published, whether in the accusations section or in the gambling section or even in comment posts, the user is not right and the casino can find arguments to support its position. Of course, here I mean the accusations that target casinos known for their integrity.

And often, the accusation topics for one casino follow one another in a very short period. This often happens with casinos that operate outside the forum and do not have representation here.

I believe those scam accusations against those casinos that operate outside of the forum, and those that don't have any representation among the trusted campaign of the community, are useless accusations. It will probably be good to be included in a list of which services to avoid. But if a brand new account makes an accusation vs. an unknown casino, what good could that do for us in BitcoinTalk?

Of course, this would be very good even if the casino had no activity on the forum, because this forum is public and open to view without even having to register an account. On this basis, the accusations section can be an important reference for researching and verifying any open cases against any of the companies active in the crypto space, including casinos and crypto-based gaming platforms. Being a member of the forum does not mean that I will not use any service platform outside of it, so it is good that the forum provides a full section for publishing about any of the service platforms.

Quote from: Wind_FURY on August 05, 2024, 05:25:58 AM

Quote

This does not mean that all casinos are always honest because some of them have turned into scams over time, but in general it can be said that casino projects that have representation on the forum and have active interaction with the community here, are always careful in implementing their policies because they realize that any mistake, no matter how small, could lead to ruining their reputation. This confirms the possibility of considering the forum as a relative guarantee of the integrity of some projects that build part of their reputation using it.

If the casino has a current signature campaign that's managed by a trustworthy manager, then there's a higher probability that that casino is not a scam. Managers usually stop representing them when they start becoming scams.

The campaign doesn’t necessarily have to be ongoing to verify the project’s eligibility, but it could have successfully campaigned on the forum and not been accused of anything since its launch. Such forum activity could still be evidence of integrity since it is easily proven and available on search engines. I’m not saying that every casino that has or has had a representation here on the forum is necessarily honest, but a large part of ensuring integrity can be proven through the forum.