Quote from: ndumm on Today at 03:17:14 AM

[...]I would recommend that no one else in this thread give any more time to this guy until he provides some form of indisputable proof (which I'm confident won't come, because our hosts take player welfare incredibly seriously).[...]

If you don't mind, I'd like to see this thread to its end and every dirty clothes aired, because it became mildly interesting how OP seemed to accidentally put the clothes into a tumble dryer instead of air drying it, and now he's tumbling all over with the laudry.

OP, let's play surgery and dissect your statement thus far. I believe I've thoroughly disinfect my hands with the statement that I am not in any degree involved to Shuffle. I've wear the latex glove and yield a scalpel, and...

First

Quote from: honestworld on August 13, 2024, 09:54:37 PM

Let's clarify a few things here.

First, it's important to understand that the intention behind raising these concerns isn't to hurl baseless accusations or discredit anyone without cause. The aim is to ensure that we, as a community, are vigilant and proactive in assessing potential risks, especially given the history of the industry we’re dealing with. The collapse of FTX serves as a stark reminder that what appears legitimate on the surface can have deep-seated issues lurking beneath. It's not about accusing Noah of being another SBF, but rather ensuring that due diligence is performed so that we don't find ourselves blindsided again.

Noah may very well be an upstanding individual with no history of wrongdoing. The point isn’t to say he’s guilty of anything, but to emphasize the need for transparency and accountability in an industry that has seen its fair share of deceit. Even if Noah was unaware of any fraudulent activities at FTX, it’s still prudent for us to scrutinize the practices of any new venture he’s involved in—especially one in a highly unregulated and risky sector like online gambling.

Consulting back to your opening statement,

Quote from: honestworld on August 04, 2024, 06:52:14 PM

Serious Questions About Shuffle.com (Launched by Former FTX Employee)

Hello everyone,

I wanted to bring up some serious concerns regarding Shuffle.com, a new platform launched by Noah Dummett, a former employee of FTX. Here are some key points that need your attention, and I’m curious if anyone else has noticed these issues or has additional information:

Background Concerns

1. Noah Dummett's FTX Connection:
- Noah Dummett, who previously worked at FTX, is behind the launch of Shuffle.com. Given the collapse of FTX and the legal issues surrounding its operations, does anyone else feel uneasy about the integrity and transparency of Shuffle.com?

It called "leading" in court, or in a more common terms, or "to paint someone certain color". You're saying that the point of this thread is not to say he's guilty, rather to emphasize the need of [summarized] us being vigilant, yet the wording on the opening post suggest one should weight the possible risk of integrity and transparency of shuffle for his former employment. Your post above and your opening post has a very different tone.

Second

Next, cam... Cam oh cam... I suddenly wondered what does "cam" stand for.

Cameron? Cambridge? Campbell? Camilo? Camcorder, perhaps?

Speaking about camcorder... which purpose is to record something... do you aware that the forum is being automatically crawled by two different sites made by two extremely prominent members of the forum? As in... recorded, archived, cam...corded, if you wish, so when one delete one post for whatever reason that is, it can easily be dug out.

Such as this one,

Quote from: https://ninjastic.space/post/64395400

I want to add another issue regarding Shuffle.com, specifically related to Cam, one of the key figures operating under an alias. It's come to light that Cam's handling of people, particularly those struggling with gambling addiction, is not only disrespectful but downright harmful.

Gambling addiction is a serious issue that ruins lives and families. A responsible operator would take measures to help mitigate the risks, provide support, and ensure that players are treated with dignity and respect. Unfortunately, this does not seem to be the case with Shuffle.com under Cam's influence. Reports and observations suggest that Cam has shown a blatant disregard for the well-being of players, prioritizing profit over people. Shockingly, it almost appears as though Cam takes pleasure in the suffering of those affected by addiction, which is more than deeply disrespectful – it is morally reprehensible.[...]

of which prompt me to chase this case as I treat neglect to gambling addiction as a very serious matter, and which made me inquire you to provide supporting evidence, of which after several deflection [by asking me to provide proof that your allegation is wrong instead of you providing the evidence for your statement], you said that,

Quote from: honestworld on August 10, 2024, 07:31:14 PM

[...]
Do you want me to share here conversations of Cam? I will be gladly to do so, the entire community is beyond depressed of lovely Cam.

Quote from: honestworld on August 13, 2024, 09:36:37 PM

In fact, a sad player (and partner) spoke to him yesterday right after he deleted him

He will probably be very mad at me for sharing this but hey, at crypto(casinos) you can do anything you want right?

The funny par,t my friend. Cam is never inactive - in fact Cam sees everything and is aways online only he choses of course hen to respond at his comfortable safe place. The part that worries me the most is that you are defending somebody you absolutely don't know a thing about - please don't get me wrong I'm only here to protect people against anything that triest to take advantage.

This doesn't directly confirms the addiction part (it does a bit) but I'm just curious about your opinion.

[image snip]

There is a screenshot of the conversation and here a transcript:[...]

I saved the screenshot in my gallery for future reference if needed. That screenshot though, indeed, doesn't confirm the addiction part. So perhaps you can help us with a better proof?

You alleged Cam of Shuffle handling people with gambling addiction in disrespectful manner, hinting an abuse of responsible gambling act, the proof so far is him ranting and bad mouthing about other casinos, of which... though I find it a bit mean to rant as such, barely covers the point you initially tried to raise [and later deleted] where he failed to address gambling addiction situation.

I'll really appreciate a better evidence. Thank you.

Third

Quote from: honestworld on Today at 12:05:06 AM

Update: Brett, Cam’s Brother, and His Role at Shuffle

It has come to my attention that another key figure at Shuffle.com, Brett, is Cam's brother. Brett also holds a significant role within the company, and unfortunately, his behavior seems to mirror that of Cam, raising additional concerns about the company’s overall approach to customer interaction and community management.[...]

I thought,

Quote from: honestworld on August 04, 2024, 06:52:14 PM

[...]

2. Anonymous Key Personnel:
- There are key individuals at Shuffle.com using aliases, such as "Cam" and "Brett." It’s been suggested that "Cam" knows Noah from earlier days, and both he and "Brett" are operating under false names. Has anyone else encountered these individuals or have any insight into why they might be using pseudonyms?

[...]

1. Demand Transparency:
- Should we as a community demand full transparency about the identities of the key personnel at Shuffle.com and their roles within the company?[...]

Which one is it? They're not transparent enough that should raise a degree of suspicion or they're [apparently] way beyond transparent that you know Brett and Cam are brothers?

Still about Brett, and this is the continuation of your post I snipped above about him,

Quote from: honestworld on Today at 12:05:06 AM

[...]

In a recent review of conversations, Brett displayed a pattern of dismissiveness and a lack of accountability when handling customer issues. For instance:

- Aggressive and Dismissive Behavior: Brett, like Cam, appears to dismiss user concerns without providing adequate reasoning. In one interaction, Brett muted a user for 30 days but refused to provide a clear explanation or retrieve chat logs to justify the action, stating, "I am the one who decides whether or not something is justified to mute a player and today I decided to mute him." When pressed for screenshots or further explanation, Brett chose to disengage, saying he had "work to get done."

- Failure to Address Community Concerns: Brett also failed to properly address community feedback, leading to confusion and dissatisfaction among users. When the chat community questioned why a user was muted, Brett did not provide clarity or engage meaningfully, which only worsened the situation.

These interactions suggest a troubling culture within Shuffle, where dismissiveness and a lack of transparency are not isolated incidents but rather part of a broader pattern among key personnel. This is particularly concerning when both Cam and Brett are in positions of influence, as it raises questions about the overall management and ethical standards of the company.

Citations:

- "I am the one who decides whether or not something is justified to mute a player and today I decided to mute him." (Message ID 569611)
- "I have players to attend to and work to get done." (Message ID 569626)

How is this concerning? If any, the impression I get is that he does his work very greatly that I think he needs a raise [ndumm, in case you read this]. I mean, you literally shows snippets where he weeded out, what I'll strongly assume as, spammers and abusers to ensure the chatbox is clean, and he attends to players.

Where is the part that he does concerning matters that's detrimental and worth questioning Shuffle's overall integrity for employing such key employee?

And oh, four,

Quote from: honestworld on August 13, 2024, 09:36:37 PM

The part that worries me the most is that you are defending somebody you absolutely don't know a thing about - please don't get me wrong I'm only here to protect people against anything that triest to take advantage.[...]

Risking to sound extremely redundant, worry not, darling, I am not "defending somebody I absolutely don't know a thing about", I am inquiring a proof of allegation towards someone [now two people]. I'll be very happy if you can revert with better proof to support your allegation.