Quote from: swaga on Today at 11:46:46 AM

Quote from: swaga on August 04, 2024, 04:34:42 PM

Quote from: justincase78 on August 04, 2024, 06:17:53 AM

exactly, crypto casino owners.. especially successful ones... are not stupid people at all. they know if the many crypto whales that lurk this forum see "$6MIL NOT RECEIVED BCGAME [RESOLVED]" it would be amazing branding for the casino. i think this guy is just unfamiliar with BCGame, they have done like $100m in sports deals past 2 years, my $6m is nothing to them and it would only benefit them paying it out.

This feels like a stunt made by bc to get some attention. After enough attention is accumulated they will release your funds and claim they made it right for you. You will change the title of the thread to "6m bc.game SOLVED" and boom, bc.game just got free advertisement for $0.

Keep your head up and lawyer up, go after their licence and make it clear you're not backing down.

Called it.
Good to see this ended well for the op.
Until the next time bois

If you bother to read every post here carefully, or perhaps the post made by OP that conclude this case, of which almost similar with the one he now made as his opening post, the host was in hospital for the last few weeks.

Accidents happen, and personal emergencies do exist.

If you, or anyone, for whatever reason think this is a stunt pulled by BC, that you've called about one week ago, I'll "call" my week-old explanation as a response, that if it's a stunt by BC, the law of diminishing returns applies here. They only have certain duration of time and amount of fund before the graph do a sharp downward.

I am sure you, or anyone who share the same idea that it's just a stunt, or basically anyone else overseeing this case, really, can't imagine the length and depth of conversation I have with BC staffs, plural, what resources I and they exhaust to get this one tackled. I speak with many of them, jumping from one to another, and based on the dialogues I have with each of them, I tend to think this is not a stunt they're trying to pull.

And last, to give another blow to that "stunt" theory, the law of diminishing returns did apply here. The graph had dived sharply. The last convo around the thread were heavy with scepticism and all whilst I was still trying to get this thing sorted out with their higher ups. And the sentiment only changed [I think] because OP throw his giveaway.

So... a stunt they pull? LOL