Quote from: nutildah on Today at 11:32:28 AM

Quote from: PrimeHunter2023 on Today at 10:05:45 AM

You and biolizard typically are in lockstep.

Both of you have slyly discouraged any efforts to bring namecoin to a wider audience.

LOL bro that is simply hilarious. Wat???

biolizard has done more for Namecoin than almost everybody on the planet, and I've been a fan of it since 2014.

If the current audience isn't wide enough for you, you commit the efforts. I don't think you appreciate the technical challenges of maintaining or improving something of this nature. Am not really interested in chatting with you anymore until you can say something of actual substance.

You are very clever at redirecting an issue so that people are confused into supporting your view.

The issue is not how long you and biolizard have been working with namecoin.

The issue is whether your goal is to promote the use of decentralized naming...or prevent it.

My opinion is that you two, and others, do not support the use of a naming system outside of govt/icann control.

That's what the evidence seems to point to, read previous posts.

Answer this question directly if you don't mind.

Do you believe it would be better or worse if domains were entirely decentralized outside govt/icann control?

I'm sorry if my curiousity makes the thread uncomfortable but it seems like a reasonable thing to try to figure out what's going on.

Others have expressed similar concerns on this thread and elsewhere.

~

There are other issues too that make a person wonder. I'll give an example before you ask.

Namecoin devs seem to have a relationship with monero devs.

You must remember the absolute scumbaggishness of Monero's beginning, flat out gangsters harassing and spamming in a very high dollar campaign...but here is the example...

A while back I used to trade small coins on Cryptsy to make a little money.

One coin was bte bytecoin made by user maria2.0 or something like that. I googled the coins I traded almost daily looking for info that might affect trading.

One day, suddenly, there were two bte's.

One was the coin I was trading.

The other was a coin that did not exist one day, but literally had a multi year history on Google the next day.

So I started with a well founded mistrust of bte then watched the absolute crookedest gangsterish coin gang i.e., monero, ooze out of that swamp.

So I am a little curious about the genesis of the nmc monero relationship.

My guess is that once pkc is discredited the gang will promote the ring signature algorithms, overnight btc will be trash and the ring sig gangster swine will be wealthy. Just a guess.

There are other examples I could give.

Let's start with the question in bold type asked above.