Well it’s reasonable.. Then what about these cases.
<snip>
<snip>
Then here’s this case of duelbits denying a player withdrawal of 1million usd by calling them out for cheating.
https://casino.guru/duelbits-casino-player-s-account-has-been-closedAnd they still operate freely.
People in their campaign will defend the brand they are promoting as long as they are getting paid by it.
There are many other cases that i can look into. I would like to know your thoughts on these.
Are you asking me in particular? Because I don't recall anything from the old post you referenced, and aside from lightlord paying people at his leisure and to the inconvenience of the recipients, I don't follow the tons of gambling scams/drama/what-have-you and can't really give an informed comment unless I delved into that stuff--and I'm not going to, because that's best left to DT members who understand gambling and casinos better than I do.
Regarding members defending whatever service they promote in their signature space....unless they are actually hardcore supporters of that service, I think that's a bad way to view a sig campaign. You're renting out your profile space and that's it, not endorsing the service any further than that (that's how I see it, anyway, except for Foxpup's Merit Cycling Club which I will have engraved on my tombstone).