Quote from: Wiwo on September 03, 2024, 09:53:01 PM

Quote from: Coin_trader on September 02, 2024, 03:59:40 AM

You keep mentioning that you don’t want to accuse Bitcasino for the 88ETH loss on your wallet yet you keep emphasizing this 88ETH all over your thread about your Bitcasino frustration.

You are trying guilt trip Bitcasino for your loss hoping they will compensate as good gesture but there’s no way a casino will be involved on funds that withdrawn from your own wallet. Do you connect your wallet on Bitcasino through web3(assuming Bitcasino supports web3).

He is systematically calling the casino out either with his direct speech or the indirect one, why he seem to say that he is not calling them out is because he knows that the casino have no direct relationship to what happen to his stored ethereuem in the wallet, since the wallet where the Ether are stored are not the casino hot wallet but his individual wallet where only him have access to.

Same goes with how the scammers got access, instead of out rightly accusing a casino that have some well established data base and presence in the market so it may likely get to a point where fake accusations like this one will come out and we should already know how those accusations can easily be verified

Actually, my Metamask wallet was connected to the casino, which is how I conducted the withdrawal. This direct connection means Bitcasino can’t simply wash their hands of the issue. Now, yes, I am calling them out—especially after Matthew’s evasive behavior.

This isn’t about ‘fake accusations.’ This is about Bitcasino’s failure to address legitimate concerns and their CEO’s dismissive actions. Their so-called reputation doesn’t shield them from accountability. The focus shifting to the theft and away from the broader issues just highlights how they avoid dealing with real problems faced by their VIP clients.