You are very much correct, however, what I was telling the mr. democrat legiteum is there is no evidence that can implicate the government that they are hacking directly on the people. However, because of these laws very much similar to what you have mentioned and these laws like the Patriot Act, the government are giving themselves the right to invade the people's privacy.
I am quite certain Harris cannot mention that she is against CBDC because this would certainly make the rulers from Wall Street and the banking industry very angry heheheh.
LOL, I am anything but "Mr. Democrat".
There are many millions of Republicans in the USA who oppose Trump:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Republicans_who_oppose_the_Donald_Trump_2024_presidential_campaignThe existing laws about banking in the US are absolutely nothing like... the Patriot Act. That doesn't even make sense.
Harris has not stated whether she is for a CBDC. Harris has also not mentioned her views on C++ versus C, either. Or which side of the toilet paper roll should face outward. I doubt she'll get into that when there are things that Americans
actually care about that to talk about.
And why would "the rulers from Wall Street" care about a CBDC anyhow? Wall Street is all-in on Bitcoin, and a CBDC wouldn't make any difference to Bitcoin anyhow. And there's essentially no constituency anywhere for a CBDC in the US left, right or center, so... it's not going to happen.