Quote from: tranthidung on September 12, 2024, 02:19:40 PM

Your transaction
https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/transactions/btc/e6d33c70fe78022b6d895e81ad0ab84a33eb1023135f45fa0360249900b4059c

It was confirmed in a block mined by Foundry USA mining pool.
https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/blocks/btc/860996

Your last hope is contact Foundry USA mining pool and hope that they help you by refund the mistakenly sent fee. Like Antpool did in this following case.
https://cryptoslate.com/antpool-to-refund-record-3-1m-bitcoin-transaction-fee-after-costly-user-mistake/

If they support you, you must sign a mesagge from that address to prove you are the true owner.

I'll digress a bit from the main topic of the discussion, in this story I was interested in the following point.

Bitcoin implies decentralization, but aren't the actions of a mining pool that has the ability to influence the course of events in the BTC-network (returning the cost of inflated transaction fees to the sender. of course, considering that it was from "his own pocket".) some manifestation of "centralization"?

I feel sorry to see similar stories, when users mistakenly send large sums of money for fees and I support their desire to return what was lost, this to some extent differs from the idea of BTC-maximalists who reject centralization. Centralization is bad, but also a necessity, isn't it.