Quote from: Best_Change on Today at 07:50:31 AM

The cryptocurrency community has long been divided into two camps - some criticize exchangers and exchanges for poor compliance with AML legislation, while others criticize them for too harsh measures to comply with AML. Iin particular, exchangers are often hated for selective KYC procedures which are required in cases when a processed transaction has a high percentage of risk scorinselectivg. (even in this topic there is a representative of this camp).

It depends on who and how they look at it. Obviously, most of you* instant exchangers have your policy, which is very easily abused. That's why we now have 47 seized exchangers.

What certainly forces most exchangers into violation is the freezing of user funds. I'm sure none of them have a license for such a thing. But you adapted that rule to yourself* under the pretext of AML because it suits you*.
Many exchanges on your service have accusations of seized user funds, it may seem to you that it has been resolved, but it is not. Don't you think that the investigation was launched after numerous complaints about the illegal confiscation of users' funds?

* - I am deliberately including you in the group of instant exchangers, because you directly depend on them and the rules under which they work.