Quote from: promise444c5 on September 25, 2024, 07:06:22 PM

Thus even if the rule is been created(apart from the plagiarism), the content still needs to be reported and the decisions will still have to be carried out by mod.

I know members will be reporting AI-generated content and the users being reported should get some punishment along with deleting their posts.

Quote from: Apocollapse on Today at 04:10:27 AM

Because the forum don't want to lose more traffic, not all reports in plagiarism are taken action by moderators, only the posts are being deleted, while the users didn't get banned. So, this might be the reason why all users that use AI didn't get banned.

About plagiarism, I don't think a user is banned if it's proved that they have been involved in plagiarism, but when it comes to AI-generated content, users aren't getting banned, only the posts are deleted.

Quote from: lovesmayfamilis on Today at 08:36:38 AM

I'll show you an example. OP, you are misinterpreting your guesses about where the AI texts come from. And when we see this kind of behavior, where there are a lot of similar phrases torn out of a million articles on the Internet and collected together in another, next answer, it still does not belong to the person who copied and pasted it.
And yes, such posts can be seen not only by those who use AI, but also by those who often check such posts.
Just answer, can this post not be considered plagiarism when the tool shows other sources from which the sentences were torn out?

I understand, I know that AI-generated content is plagiarism but it's plagiarism on the part of the bot providing that content, and the reason why I believe it's wrong to use those texts as someone's own is because they are not referencing that they have used an AI model or a bot to generate that. If I use ChatGPT to generate a code or anything, and I mention that I have used ChatGPT to do this, it shouldn't be a problem, but if I don't do that, it means I'm trying to use that thing as my own and that is wrong. I understand it's plagiarism of a sort, but we currently don't have strict rules regarding it, hence this thread.

Those who say AI-generated content falls under the plagiarism rule in the forum rules list, I want to ask them the same question asked by LoyceV earlier. Why aren't users who are reported with evidence getting banned? If someone is found guilty of plagiarism and there is a rule against it, the person should get punished for that. Having their posts deleted and leaving them to keep doing what they have been doing isn't how it should be dealt with if it falls under a forum rule and they are breaking it again and again.

As an example, you can look at the post history of this guy, it's the same user that I referenced in the OP. I reported some posts from this user yesterday, all of them were AI-generated, and both I and LoyceV, reported him in the AI Spam Report Reference Thread but I upon checking his post history again today, I can see that the posts reported have been deleted but he did a few again after that, without getting any punishment for it. Why?

If this falls under plagiarism, the punishment should be the same for it, and if it doesn't, there should be a separate rule and punishment for it. That is the basic reason why I started this thread.