Quote from: JollyGood on Today at 09:34:14 AM

Snip

If we go straight to the main point. AB de Royse777 created a flag against jamyr and on the charges that he violated the terms of the review campaign of [CFNP] Mixin Safe - Decentralized Bitcoin Custody Solutions | Review Campaign and your negative tag which was your charge against him was based on the violation of the review and was Darkstar_ loan. In the court of law, Prior bad acts and other crime evidence (propensity evidence) is not used to against the defendant when the crime was not mention in the case by the accuser in the case file.

Flag was created because jamyr didn't made the review and he has already collected the 0.003 BTC from the manager and now the same manager said jamyr has paid back the money and he said that jamyr is a good guy therefore he has removed the flag and asked others who tagged jamyr base on that course to remove theirs and I like what they said.

Quote from: LoyceV on September 25, 2024, 06:08:22 PM

Quote from: NeuroticFish on September 25, 2024, 06:02:24 PM

I would not expect everybody be so eager to do the same.

I removed it because that's how the Flag system is supposed to be used, not because I trust jamyr. That's why I didn't Oppose the Flag.

This is how it should be. When a creator of the flag request others to remove because they have settled their differences underground then we have to follow and if the defendant plead guilty and repent from his sin, second chance should be given. Though every lawyer and judge has their opinion in a case but general precedence over rule.