Yes, that is exactly what I said. More than that, you yourself admit your so called DB as having some whatever % probability of false positives, but at the same time (!) you argue about deterministic vs probabilistic methods, I mean really, WTF? I won't even mention again the non-sense about probability decay or whatever you called that thing you believe is happening when the interval size grows.

Ignorance is when you make claims without actually having anything to back them up with. So - do you know of any key that can't be solved by Kangaroo, if I show you that ANY public key you give me in some interval, I can break in sub-sqrt time, which proves you wrong? Would you say that using some 10 GB of helper data that can solve any key is worse or better than having a 1 MB file that takes forever to process, and isn't even as deterministic as you claim? For Kangaroo, we can simply add a false collision to a secondary table, which by itself makes it much more as a guarantee of never missing a true positive collision, unlike your super-tiny ultra lightweight bitmap.