Data to prove your claim?
I didn't make any data based claims.
OK, thanks for your honesty.
Centralized mixers might have flaws, there might be weaknesses, but those entities actually making no effort of mixing their users' outputs?
A mixing site is not "flawed". A mixing site does not have "weaknesses".
A mixing site has LITERALLY NO PRIVACY ASPECTS WHATSOEVER, A MIXING SITE JUST GENERATES A DEPOSIT ADDRESS FOR THE SCAMMER'S WALLET.Data to confirm your claims?
Because not all centralized mixers are built the same, no? Although you make a good point of telling us that there are bad actors out there, but there must be those good ones that do provide an actual service of making users' outputs untraceable?
¯\_(ツ)_/¯