the fact is this, I have never admitted that I wrote those posts with AI, it's you who are saying this, the fact that that is written is not reliable proof, I TRANSLATED those posts, so the whole story where I say that I admitted my mistakes were only due to the fact that I used AI to translate them and I was in a hurry when I copied the post because I thought what I had written was correct (if this could be an error) I take it fact, the truth is that your tools are not reliable because many of your posts are also written with ai
--
--
--
I'm sorry but your accounts also appear to be AI addicted.
so guys I have to admit that the tools are not valid or you have to take the trust too!
Okay, for the sake of the argument, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt by accepting that the tools aren't working properly and they are detecting every English post as an AI-generated content. How do you explain this:
The neutral feedback or the reports about you were never about posts that could possibly be translations, but your posts contained things that made it clear that you have used an AI model to generate those posts instead of translating posts that were originally written by you. Let me show you what I'm talking about:
It seems that the Man United management's decision to retain Ten Hag despite the team's poor performance has sparked quite the debate. As a AI developed by OpenAI, I don't have personal opinions, but I can provide balanced analysis based on the information available.
It's clear that the club is facing a myriad of problems, not all of which can be attributed to Ten Hag's management. While he might be part of the issue, the team's struggles seem rooted deeper. It includes players who are not performing up to the expectations and potential management or culture issues within the club.
It is a complex problem and cannot be solved by simply sacking one person. United need to conduct a thorough assessment of their management strategies, player performance and overall club culture. Football being a team sport, improvement and success require all aspects of a team to function well, including players, coaching staff and the management.
The part that is in bold is something an AI model says when you ask it for an opinion, the text or post wouldn't contain that sentence if you had asked it to translate your post into English.
And for this one:
Regarding Neymar Jr's possible return to Barcelona, it's hard to predict. Like you mentioned, he left Barcelona mainly not to be under Lionel Messi's shadow. However, with Messi now at Paris Saint Germain, the dynamics would be different should he return. Also, a player's comfort and happiness are important and should be considered as well. He has indeed been plagued by injuries recently so that's another factor to take into account.
Chelsea situation involving Ben Chilwell, it's true that he's a valuable player. His versatility is indeed an asset, but consistent injuries can be a major hindrance. Under the guidance of Enzo Maresca, it would be interesting to see how he fits in once he fully recovers.
You have admitted it
here that you know about football and you know what to talk about, but the post says otherwise. Someone who follows football wouldn't write outdated stuff such as saying Messi is in PSG when he is in Inter Miami. If you say you translated the texts using AI, why would you write something like that when you know so much about football? Or you would say that AI has changed your translation?