Quote from: LogitechMouse on October 10, 2024, 01:39:24 AM

I'll give you the benefit of the doubt.
Okay, let's say that Jeff Garzik is Satoshi. Now what?

Does it solve the scalability issues of Bitcoin? Does it solve the current problems of Bitcoin? Does it change the fact that many people see Bitcoin more of an asset rather than a currency? Does it solve the problem of high transaction fees? Answer me OP please.

I don't know if somebody here still care about who Satoshi is, but for me, I don't care anymore. I mean knowing who the real Satoshi is doesn't bother me at all. I might be excited FOR ABOUT 15 SECONDS and then I will be back to the reality. Many people claimed that they're Satoshi and that further makes the searching way difficult. Let's just not waste time finding who Satoshi is because knowing him/her/they will not change the current problems of Bitcoin. PLEASE!!!

It won't solve anything. In fact, it will make matters worse. The government will pursue Satoshi until he's forced to give up his private keys, or even shut down Bitcoin itself (although we know this is impossible). Then, they will either kill him or imprison him. It's best for things to remain as is. The less we know about who Satoshi is or ever was, the better. Otherwise, Bitcoin's image will be damaged far beyond repair.

Why not focus on what matters most? We should focus on scaling Bitcoin and making it an acceptable means of payment worldwide. Just because everyone knows who created ETH, doesn't mean Satoshi should give up his identity. He/she/they did it for the good of the project itself. All in the best interests to help protect decentralization. I'm glad Bitcoin is in the hands of the community. It will outlive other cryptocurrencies in the long run. Just you wait and see. At this point, it's safe to assume we're all Satoshi. Right? Cheesy