Quote from: Pmalek on October 20, 2024, 03:33:56 PM

You could have avoided many of the comments in this thread if you didn't emphasize the no-KYC part in your OP. The grin smiley for the no-KYC category makes a lot of sense because it is a joke to claim something like that. You are a no-KYC exchange only on paper. In reality, your terms sate that users will pass through AML/KYC procedures from time to time or if required. On top of that, you partner with other exchanges that also require KYC and have their own filters and understanding of what requires further checks and what doesn't.

Most exchanges do not seem to fully understand the meaning of no-KYC and it would be good to see some progress at least in their acceptance of whether or not they are a no-KYC exchange. If there is any 'but' or any condition, there is no reason to represent them as no-kyc.

Quote from: Swap_Sphera on October 20, 2024, 12:32:45 PM

Quote from: Swap_Sphera on October 19, 2024, 06:46:28 AM

btw. eXch is truly a no-KYC exchanger. So, it is possible.

The guys did great, respect to them, but this is just a temporary situation.

Quote from: Swap_Sphera on October 20, 2024, 12:32:45 PM

Quote

The SSL certificate has almost become irrelevant, every hosting offers it for free or for example CloudFlare and it really does not make a significant difference in the relevance of the site/domain.

It’s obvious, but you said that we are using a low-quality certificate and that we cannot be trusted because of this. In reality, we are not using a free certificate that is handed out everywhere; instead, we choose one that meets our current needs for a relatively small amount. It’s easy to tarnish someone’s reputation and say anything, but understanding the situation is not something everyone is capable of.

Try to pay attention to these quotes because it seems that your reply is quite confusing.