Quote from: Swap_Sphera on October 20, 2024, 12:32:45 PM

Quote from: Swap_Sphera on October 19, 2024, 06:46:28 AM

btw. eXch is truly a no-KYC exchanger. So, it is possible.

The guys did great, respect to them, but this is just a temporary situation. ...

Quote from: Swap_Sphera on October 22, 2024, 08:13:48 AM

Soon, everyone will probably switch this advantage to "No KYC if you legal!" to warn those who advocate the pure use of No KYC while promoting the black market. However, as long as at least one platform hasn’t changed this on their site, the rule will stay as it is, no matter how much attention you draw to it.

The projects Exolix, Swapuz, Swapter and LetsExchange that belong to the same circle of NowPayments shady entities and most probably to you yourself along with your other project SimpleSwap, are also quite a temporary situation, just like those 47 exchanges that were seized earlier and that also had absolutely same AML/KYC policies like your exchangers you promote here.

The point you are trying to defend here, mistakenly assuming that implementing basic AML/KYC screening and seizing funds will somehow exclude you from being investigated by law enforcement in future, is already a common fallacy, since even major CEX with fully implemented companies and licenses are often subjects of money laundering charges with those being sound examples:

- Binance and KuCoin recently investigated for money laundering
- 47 BestChange-affiliated exchangers that had AML/KYC policies (same as your projects) charged and seized for wrongly implemented AML/KYC policies
- Other exchangers (like BitPapa and NetEx24) that also had AML/KYC policies charged and seized for thinking if they lie about AML/KYC terms on their website it would help them to avoid charges

Your idea of being "Non-KYC but scamming your users for dirty funds" is absolutely no better than being just "Non-KYC and honest", since by the end of day, your exchangers will face same risks as any non-KYC exchanges that don't implement risk screening and funds confiscation (scam) policies.

I would argue that actually your set of websites has even more risks of being stopped by law enforcement than other anonymous websites that do not seize user funds, because projects like Exolix actually have no registered company on their behalf that would allow them to seize user funds (till now there is absolutely no evidence of any of websites you promote having a registered company).

AML/KYC policies can be only properly implemented with having a registered company, which is something that none of your projects have, so actually you trying to play police makes it only worse for yourself.

Quote from: Swap_Sphera on Today at 09:15:23 AM

Quote from: dkbit98 on October 23, 2024, 07:31:14 PM

... It is well known fact they worked for years without any verification and without anything being audited.

Publicly? Where did you find such information? Do each of them report to users? You will never get this kind of information from open sources.

This information can be obtained from relevant industry and business regulators, not necessarily from open sources.

By the way, I have a suggestion in regards to your company GAVAL & Partners, s.r.o. registered in 2008 in Czech Republic (https://apl.czso.cz/res/detail?ico=28458524).

You probably should consider changing your main business activity type from civil construction to something related to financial services.

Also, I would like to bring everyone's attention to this specific line from the official CZ business registry about SwapSphera's company:

"Institucionální sektor dle ESA2010: 11003 - Nefinanční podniky pod zahraniční kontrolou" ("Institutional sector according to ESA2010: 11003 - non-financial companies under foreign inspection")

This means that SwapSphera's legal entity has no permission to operate in financial industry at this moment.