Quote from: Proty on October 26, 2024, 08:30:08 AM

Quote from: Samlucky O on October 25, 2024, 04:11:11 PM

Quote from: Ambatman on October 20, 2024, 09:19:04 PM

Quote from: Ruttoshi on October 20, 2024, 01:40:54 PM

Snip

Aggressively is aggressively
There's nothing like over doing it and under doing it.
If you invest aggressively it would help get to your Bitcoin target faster or slower is two ways.

Ambatman I guess you are missing something here, when people talks about investing aggressively, it comes in two forms which are this two below, this is my own definition or explanation of aggressivenes:
1. Overdoing aggressive investment: this simply means when an investor increase his bitcoin accumulation process from the initial regular amount to a new amount without considering the size of his discretion and may be financially distablized as a result of lack of planning. maybe his salary is $200 and he often invest $20 weekly making it $80 per month. He now decide to increase from the initial weekly $20 to $30 weekly making it $120 in a month without considering the effect it will cause him just because he want to increase his bitcoin portfolio, so surely he is overdoing it. Because the remaining $80 may not be capable to handle all
2. Underdoing aggressive investment: may simply means a normal way of investing without overdoing it. Just an opposite explanation. You may still increase your investment process without being affected in this category.

Buying Aggressively is not greediness it depends on the condition at which you bought. If you buy when you have a reasonable or sizable amount in your discretion and not being affected it is not greediness but when you decide to buy agresively without a reasonable amount in your discretion it becomes greediness and stupidity.

Yes it is true one can buy bitcoin agressively without it having a negative impact on the investor morespecially if the investor have good discretionary income ,just like what the whales and meta planet did by accumulating bitcoin aggressively since they have what it takes, these companies has moved a larger part of there treasury into bitcoin investment.so accumulating bitcoin aggressively will only have a negative effects on the investor when the investor doesn't have a good amount in his descrition.
[/quote]

Personally I consider the classification of aggressive investing to be product of what portion of your discretionary income you use to invest into bitcoin rather than if you have a lot of discretionary income.

Of course, it should be obvious that the higher discretionary income a person has, then the more that person can invest into bitcoin, yet the mere fact that a person has a high discretionary income is not telling us anything in regards to his level of aggressiveness.

Let's say that person A has a discretionary income of $1k per month and he chooses to invest $900 per month into bitcoin, and person B has a discretionary income of $10k and he chooses to invest $4k per month into bitcoin. I would argue that person A is being more aggressive than person B, even though person B is investing more into bitcoin, yet relative to his discretionary income, he is just investing a medium amount. Sure person B is not being whimpy.. but he is not being as aggressive as person A in regards to his bitcoin investment.

Anyhow, my point in terms of describing aggressiveness or not aggressive would be to look at how much discretionary income is being used to invest into bitcoin (as a kind of percentage) rather than as an absolute quantity... and by the way if person B was ONLY investing around $1,000 to $1,500 per month into bitcoin, we might even label him as whimpy, even though he would be investing more into bitcoin than person A who is ONLY investing $900 per month into bitcoin.