Like was stated by chatGPT in boils down to the intensity and wright
So you can't put a score, it varies
False. Yes you can, you can put a range, even if you don't know the exact calories a person burns. And by knowing that range you can realise that doing 100 push-ups burns very few calories, just as it has a very limited effect on the strength you can gain, mostly in sedentary people and at the beginning.
For me the good thing about trying to do 100 push-ups as a challenge would be to take it as the start of more physical activity. Start with 100 push-ups but work your way up to other parts of the body, and walk, especially walk. If you are at risk of heart disease because of your lifestyle, doing 100 push-ups won't change anything, but walking 10,000 steps at least 5 days a week will reduce your risk of heart disease, burn far more calories than push-ups and have many other benefits.
Checking the thread you can find many doing way more than a 100
I could do more than a 100 per sitting before I fell ill
If you were interested in the principles of fitness instead of the bullshit you would realise that once you get past 25 push-ups in one go the best thing to do is to get more intense, slap push-ups, incline push-ups, one-handed push-ups, etc. But you do your own thing.
So 100 Push-up feels like its in correlation with $100K
Yes, it's that nonsense that has attracted you all. It's still a joke.
And what I posted was how reading certain post burns calories was just on a lighter note
Research shows that reading burns around 50-80 calories in an hour
And around 90-150Cal/hr while reading such that requires deep concentration.
Depending on the persons weight and metabolism
See, you burn more calories reading for an hour than doing push-ups. Try going for a walk and reading if you like, and you'll burn more (although I prefer walking in natural surroundings and looking at the scenery).