here's the proof:
That actually made me laugh out load.
Ser, do what you must. Lie, gaslight, cheat, be disingenuous. But I will NEVER back down against you, and against your claims that any service is a scam without proper and verifiable data as evidence. It's simply morally wrong to say that a service is guilty because "in your opinion" it is guilty.
Plus you call me a scammer, a spammer? The only person who is actually neutral in the topic, and who was giving you the benefit of the doubt? I show you your trust-rating,
Plus you call me a scammer, a spammer? The only person who is actually neutral in the topic, and who was giving you the benefit of the doubt? I show you your trust-rating,
You are just trolling at this point.
No, I'm not. I was just asking for data, and I'm actually trying to make him understand that he can't merely point at anyone being guilty unless proven innocent. That's morally wrong.
Read my post-history in this topic, I never accused anyone of any wrong-doing especially not Wasabi. In fact, I was the only person that said Wasabi's decision to work with blockchain analytics was a necessary trade-off.
Quote
From following your deposits on a block explorer there is no evidence of any actual mixing going on. Your deposits are consolidated in the same transaction and later used to pay another user’s withdrawal. Almost every deposit into this mixer created toxic change and they didn’t even try to prevent users from reusing addresses for their withdrawal. Calling these services custodial wallets is more appropriate. Calling them mixers is dishonest advertising because there is no real meaningful level of obfuscation being provided.
That's what I was asking him! Show verifiable data! That won't be too hard, no?