Re: 🚨 Stake.com’s Rigged House Games? Unmasking the Flawed Math Behind Their “Fair”

Rip This User Apart Like Eminem Would!

Quote from: AHOYBRAUSE on Today at 05:00:21 AM

Quote from: BlackyJacky on November 10, 2024, 09:15:50 PM

Basic math and statistic told me this.

When you make 200 bets at 0,5% house edge, then you statistically will lose 1 bet, because 200 x 0,5% = 100% of 1 bet.

For example, when you make 201 bets at 0,5% house edge, then statistically you will win 100 bets and lose 101 bets.

The 1 bet you statistically will lose more after 201 bets, that is the house edge.

If the house edge is 0% and you make 200 bets, then statistically you will win 100 bets and lose 100 bets = no bet more lost = no house edge.

For example, when you make 205 bets at 5% house edge, then statistically you will win 100 bets and lose 105 bets.

Therefore, the number of bets you statistically will lose more than you win is the house edge!

The higher the house edge is, the higher is the number of bets you statistically will lose more than you win.

Quote from: Eternad on November 10, 2024, 01:29:20 PM

^thanks for the detailed reply. Since Blackjack we are talking about here, the outcome of the game depends on the players decision too which gives impact to the game.

The house edge set is when you play the game flawlessly using the blackjack table matrix but it will vary and increase significantly if you play differently from the strategy. This accusation is very hard to prove since the game needs to be checked individually for the decision making that he uses on a single game. If the game is dice then it’s easy to conclude with huge sample.

I played the game flawlessly and therefore should have experienced the advertised 0,5% house edge.

I offer to everyone to check my 180,900 bets if I played flawlessly!

Jesus Christ, what kind of math is this.
You CANNOT calculate win/loss ratio with house edge, how often do we have to tell you that??

If you make bets you win 42.22%, lose 49.1% and draw 8.49% . First of all obviously you need a huge sample size for that.
Second I highly doubt you always used the same exact bet size and as I have mentioned before. I am 100000% convinced not all of your 180k played games are blackjack, yet you claim so. Who plays at a site and plays 180000 hands of BJ while not playing any other game, stop capping man! You can prove it by showing all of history (alternatively through stake stats or whatever the site is called). But until then I believe you are straight up lying about these numbers.

By the way, I am starting to believe BlackyJacky and this KingBJ guy are totally the same person.

Listen up, you're a complete idiot, trying to rip off our community with your lies and misinformation. You think you're better than us, smarter than us, but you're not. We're both blackjack players who love the game, and we won't let a couple of RuneScape mods or Reject Squad dictate the rules on online blackjack. Your accusations are weak, your logic is flawed, and your statistics are garbage. You're trying to ruin the reputation of honest blackjack players, and you're failing spectacularly.

We won't let you control the conversation. We won't let you dictate the terms of engagement. We'll expose your lies, debunk your nonsense, and show you the truth. We'll show you that the house edge is real, that the laws of probability apply, and that you're nothing more than a fraud trying to take advantage of unsuspecting players.

So, get ready for a battle of wits and facts. Get ready for a showdown between two passionate blackjack players. And get ready to watch you crumble under the weight of reality. Because the only thing we have in common is our love for the game, and we won't let anyone else run the show. We'll stick together, stand tall, and fight back.