Quote from: kTimesG on Today at 04:59:36 PM

Quote from: JonJonBon on Today at 03:48:59 PM

Quote from: RetiredCoder on November 11, 2024, 10:23:30 AM

I'm working on 135, but it will take a lot of time, I'm not in a hurry. If you think that you compete - welcome Grin

But 99% of people even cannot correctly calculate chances and cost of this game.

Hi! I am ready to give you a method that will help you greatly reduce the time spent searching for puzzles 135, 140, 145, 150, 155, 160, and put an end to all this. Since I don't have programming skills, I can't automate it. You can write to me in person.

We are all very excited that you finally decided to be ready to share with us these exciting breakthroughs.

It was already more than 24 hours since the last range splitter / range reducer / point divider post was brought upon our limited attention. We need to never let those ideas die off! No matter how often it is explained why it does not work and why it can not work, and why it will never work, and how it actually makes things much slower, instead of much faster, it is a true inspiration to see the same question and the same idiotic idea repeated over and over and over again by new and old users.

Let's not break the cycle! Who cares that solving any problem is more or less just a matter of having enough money to spend, to actually be able to afford computing the solution? Give me a few million $ and I can solve all of those puzzles for you in less than a few months, if not faster - how about that as an actual end to all of this?

The idea has always cost money. No one will reveal anything for nothing. Any craftsman can make a thing.
But not everyone can come up with something new.