Quote from: niyvi on November 14, 2024, 04:54:18 PM

...
Agreed. A casino focused on privacy and reliability could appeal strongly to players wary of sharing personal information. However, navigating compliance carefully is essential to avoid unintended misuse by bad actors. Ensuring robust AML safeguards will be critical for long-term success and avoiding regulatory issues, especially given the risks of seizure similar to Chipmixer. Balance and vigilance are key.

Right, but if you are intended to enforce a robust AML environment, would not be a contradiction to remain fully free of KYC? Because (as far as I know), regulators will start to exert pressure on casinos which are relatively big in volume and yet unregistered or unregulated, that is what happened with the service Chipmixer, they kept themselves as a non-KYC privacy platform for a very long time, until gaining enough popularity for them to catch the attention of regulators and they got seized.
Of this casino gets big enough eventually, I am afraid you will have to choose between either keeping running and the privacy of all your gamblers.
Since we are talking about a business and an big investment of money and time into building up all this, usually staff of a casino prefer to comply regulators, in detriment of the integrity of their gamblers.

It is sad, but that is how it works, money is what seems to be what matters on the destiny of a casino or bookie, not privacy.