Quote from: Wakate on November 27, 2024, 08:26:03 PM

Quote from: delfastTions on November 27, 2024, 07:01:48 AM

Quote from: summonerrk on November 26, 2024, 02:23:00 PM

Quote from: sompitonov on November 26, 2024, 07:59:23 AM

Quote from: delfastTions on November 26, 2024, 07:48:44 AM

It has already been discussed earlier that the mention of cryptocurrency immediately creates negative associations with criminal activity in many people who are completely unfamiliar with it. So it all also depends on how a specific employer or even a judge, as you mentioned, treats cryptocurrency. And since the attitude of these people can be negative and they immediately associate such an employee with offenses and participation in illegal payments, then the decision to dismiss becomes quite natural.
And also the decision to reinstate in the position by a court decision, too.

It is a completely normal process when cryptocurrencies were previously presented on TV as something incomprehensible to people who are accustomed to traditional financial assets, and they also tried to denigrate them by saying that they are used for something bad. But we must not forget that the dollar is also used for something bad, but no one even talks about banning the dollar. If a fired employee had bet in dollars, he would also probably have been fired because gambling is prohibited in the workplace. In short, you can play, the main thing is that the employee was not noticed playing, lol.

However, I believe that this employee was unfairly detained and had the right to continue working. If a person is productive at work, he can do other things. Remember Dr. House and his bad manners, but he was productive! And isn't that the only thing required in the workplace? The main thing is to do your job well, and if the deadlines are not missed, then you can gamble or bet.
And there is a shortage of good workers in the world now.

This is absolutely fair.
And if the employee is really good, the employer will not fire him without a good reason. But I suspect that in this case the employer will even turn a blind eye to such an employee's passion for gambling or, for example, his desire to constantly post something on social networks, although all this, of course, distracts from the main work. However, I also think that this is not the case that is discussed in this topic.

Many the employer has seen him countless times gambling and has given him some warnings but he couldn't listen. I know that people are being warned before getting fired except in a case that could tarnish the organization or the company's reputation. It is not a good habit for someone to be gambling at work especially in the bank where customers can come in to lay complains. In the Bank setting ms, gambling is never advisable because if any customer gets to know about that, they may be scared that there money could be use for betting without the customer knowing.

If a bank client really sees a bank employee gambling during working hours, and even at the workplace, then this will clearly make a negative impression of the bank as a whole. And if the employee really was warned by the employer, but he did not give up such behavior and his gambling, then of course the employer must fulfill the promise and fire him.
Of course, you are also right that dismissal follows warnings and in the event that the employee did not listen to them.
And the second option is image dismissals, which follow immediately after some obvious negative behavior of the employee. For example, he commits a crime and the employer finds out about it. Naturally, the bank cannot afford to keep employees with a dubious reputation.