Quote from: Jayholio on November 29, 2024, 12:39:25 PM

Quote from: GamblingAddict247 on November 29, 2024, 12:25:27 PM

I'm genuinely surprised to see you talking about rules and moral high grounds here. Aren't you currently in prison? How exactly are you accessing the internet from jail? If you're already disregarding legal boundaries and your own commitments, perhaps it's better to focus on addressing your own issues before commenting on matters you clearly don't fully grasp. It's ironic and almost laughable for someone actively breaking rules to lecture others about them. I wonder if the authorities are aware of this behavior and the potentially dangerous activities you're conducting from behind bars!!

Quote from: Jayholio on November 29, 2024, 09:43:47 AM

Quote from: MandyShutup on November 29, 2024, 06:56:20 AM

Quote

This brings us right to the same wall I am facing with my Shuffle issues.

I'm not 100% across yours, but from what I saw you were operating within the bounds of the affiliate system though?
They just decided with your affiliate guy that you had too sweet a deal.. But it was what they offered..

And that stuff was locked before you were KYC?
Regardless don't want to cross the issues and I don't think they're remotely comparable .

Ralph 100% broke rules as they are, knew it when he was doing so, Or he would have been doing it on BC to begin with.
Has a history already with the site and seems like he was on his last chance.
They gave back depos.

I think they were more than fair to him

There's a big difference.
I don't agree with societies drug laws, And I don't really give a shit about their consequences. So I'm free to do what I want and live with it

Do you hear me complaining?

If you want to break the rules that you have to live with the consequences.
Yours is being banned and you coin confiscated.
I don't want that so I don't do it 👍🏼

I see the infractions.
I do not see how these infractions should justify them keeping his unrelated and fairly won balance.

Those funds were not fraudulently accumulated.
Just because you and your friend reported him doesn't mean that the result of it was fair.
They punished him for incidents in chat that should have resulted in his BALANCE being returned. But they kept that.

That is messed up and you are basically advocating for this Jay. Why ? Feels like a personality conflict rather than an impartial perspective.

Why are you so passionate about it?

From a realistic perspective, this appears to be a case of abuse of the snitch system along with shady punishment by the Casino.
It's not right to break the rules . But its worse to allow someone to break rules while they lose tons of money then suddenly enforce the rules when the guy gets ahead.

That is bad.