Quote from: Kruw on December 10, 2024, 02:17:35 PM

<Snip>

Great attempt at quoting a single sentence from my post and trying to sweep the rest under the rug. It didn't work though.

Here is what you should have focused on:

- The software you and your team marketed as the "ultimate privacy tool" was vulnerable for a very long time. It might still be vulnerable today and in the future because the fact that it's open-source means nothing. It was open-source while it was vulnerable as well and who noticed it? How long was it vulnerable before someone found out and how much harm did it cause while being vulnerable? You have admitted yourself that you have no coding skills, so your explanations aren't worth anything.

- The protocol requires trust. Trust that the coordinators won't try to deanonymize you.

- Each time you wrote that Wasabi and coinjoins are trustless and how the coordinator and blockchain analysis can't obtain any information about users, inputs, and outputs, you lied.

- You and your zkSNACKs buddies deliberately tricked customers into using a flawed tool, whose privacy depends on the trust of the coordinators. And you are not to be trusted.

It's becoming very clear why you are offering a free coinjoining service. You don't need fees from the users. You can get your funding from other service providers and (state) actors who would be interested in purchasing the data from you. The data, which we now know can be deanonymized.

This is just one vulnerability detected in the protocol, and it was detected too late. How many more malicious code snippets and bugs do you have that will only be detected in the future or perhaps never?