Quote from: Lanatsa on December 10, 2024, 08:42:10 PM

Quote from: bakasabo on December 10, 2024, 03:02:07 PM

Quote from: Agbe on December 10, 2024, 02:37:54 PM

Quote from: bakasabo on December 10, 2024, 09:54:20 AM

Your post made me think that that bank did not care much about that person and personnel in general. Few fails at work, caught gambling - got fired. In someway I think it might be more human to try to help that employee with his gambling. I dont think that bank fired him immediately when they saw him gambling for first time. I think there were talks, warnings before firing that person. If they see a person has problem, it would be best to help him. Instead, now he still had this gambling problem, and now he is jobless in addition. Bank made his situation from bad to worse.

If the guy didn't used customers' money then there was no need to fire him because that is what pleases him to do. That is his own choice. If he was doing his job well then there was no need fire him that was doing his work diligently. From my own understanding of the whole thing, the sacking of the Banker is beyond the gambling habit. Probably he has been borrowing from the.bank and using it to gamble and he has been reported and warned but gave deaf hear but when it was obvious and he was fired.

I suppose that people have wrong vision what bank is and how it works. I believe that people imagine it as a building with number of rooms, and a room under thick door where cash is stored. Otherwise what employee can be stealing then? In reality, everything is digitalized. Banks work with cash is very limited, and it is really hard to steal something without being noticed. If someone think that it is easy to steal from bank account or customers account, then you have never worked with banking program, never seen its UI. Everything is monitored, every little extra move is instantly alarmed and security get a warning and you get your working session blocked. If someone think that an employee can use any bank PC to enter banking program, and to make a transaction to any other account, then I suggest you to stop watching silly movies. Banking program for employees to make transactions is not like your regular private user accounts interface, where you pay bill and send money to others. And if someone think that employee can go to his bank colleagues, and they will open him a credit without bank noticing it, that is also quite impossible to happen.

You are really that right on this one on which making up some unauthorized transactions with those banking system or UI then its not something that will really be able to bypass on, considering that in every day there would really be audits about ups and downs and everything will really be traced up if there's some funds been missing then it will definitely be seen up accordingly. The only way that i do see that a bank employee will really be able to possibly steal up money is via through making use of their customers funds without their consent or awareness. Sounds impossible? No its not. I have a friend who had been working on a bank and their colleague do able to do such thing and i dont know on how its been set up on he had been successfully be able to make use of their users money.

We do know that bank system is really that having that very strict and systematized on which every possible off transactions will really be able to make out such trace without any hiccups.If they do have that particular employee who do have that some addiction towards gambling then as bank then you will be taking up some possible precautions if things gets worst. On this one then they do become that too conclusive on things on which they do immediately fire him up without having any explanation i guess. If there are some other violations then it will be that understandable.

From my working in bank experience, and experience of people I know, bank dont take random, first to apply, inexperienced or students that have practice on a position that makes transactions. An employee must work for several years before he will get access to operating with money. During those several years, banks security officers or other employees should have noticed something strange in guys behavior, addiction to something, that is something wrong with him. Even during interview or when guy apply for position that is connected with transactions, security officers do various check-ups. What I am trying to say that a guy does not turn (if he really did) into gambling addicted with elements of trying to do something illegal immediately. Its 100% banks security department fault if they let such guy work in bank and be close to clients funds. They are the origin of a problem, not a guy who is interested in gambling.