Though I put you on ignore, for the sake of the advancement of your case, lest I "twisted" your word again], apparently the notification bot still notify us when we're being mentioned by the user we ignored [I only know about this now because I only put two people on ignore so far. One is a spammer and one is... this]



Anyway, why I didn't add your complaint? I actually already have put three of your complaints against stake,





and I listen to an input made by other user for an old case of a player [that eeriely share some trait as you, if I may frankly speaking] for removing [repetitive] invalid scam accusations as it just make the list unnecessarily longer. As I said somewhere in many threads of yours, though I put you on ignore, I still read your posts from time to time to see if any significant progress has been made that worth changing the status of the case.

That case, judging from others comment [and I was there too, actually] seems to be another "invalid" case. Why? I explained on my only post there, aside from the abundance and lengthy explanation made by other more experienced users. So why don't I add it to the list? Explained on above paragraph.

If I may know, though, how exactly do I [you actually specifically mentioned my name] "actively downplaying legitimate issues while attempting to control the narrative"? While I literally said nothing aside from that post explaining how their Fair is verifiable as evidenced by an older case. Not a single post on your multi-threads, and I am still in the wrong.

I said something, I twisted your words. I said nothing, I actively downplaying legitimate issues and try to control narrative... how many times did you actually fell, head-first, when you're an infant? Pure curiosity.