Quote from: holydarkness on Today at 03:28:09 PM

Quote from: kingbj21 on December 09, 2024, 08:50:26 PM

Why hasn’t my case been added to the list of scam accusations against Stake.com?

Here’s the link to my thread: Stake.com’s Rigged House Games - Unmasking the Flawed Math Behind Their “Fair”.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5517523.0

If you believe it’s invalid, I’d appreciate a direct explanation. Otherwise, please add it properly, as it raises significant concerns backed by statistical evidence and personal experiences.

It’s disappointing to see some individuals (holydarkness and others) actively downplaying legitimate issues while attempting to control the narrative. Ignoring valid concerns doesn’t erase the fact that Stake operates with questionable practices, such as promoting illegal deposit methods, rigging games, and retaliating against users.

This isn’t about personal disputes—it’s about accountability for their actions.

Though I put you on ignore, for the sake of the advancement of your case, lest I "twisted" your word again], apparently the notification bot still notify us when we're being mentioned by the user we ignored [I only know about this now because I only put two people on ignore so far. One is a spammer and one is... this]

https://talkimg.com/images/2024/12/10/p9BAa.jpeg

Anyway, why I didn't add your complaint? I actually already have put three of your complaints against stake,

https://talkimg.com/images/2024/12/10/p9gEo.jpeg

https://talkimg.com/images/2024/12/10/p978N.jpeg

and I listen to an input made by other user for an old case of a player [that eeriely share some trait as you, if I may frankly speaking] for removing [repetitive] invalid scam accusations as it just make the list unnecessarily longer. As I said somewhere in many threads of yours, though I put you on ignore, I still read your posts from time to time to see if any significant progress has been made that worth changing the status of the case.

That case, judging from others comment [and I was there too, actually] seems to be another "invalid" case. Why? I explained on my only post there, aside from the abundance and lengthy explanation made by other more experienced users. So why don't I add it to the list? Explained on above paragraph.

If I may know, though, how exactly do I [you actually specifically mentioned my name] "actively downplaying legitimate issues while attempting to control the narrative"? While I literally said nothing aside from that post explaining how their Fair is verifiable as evidenced by an older case. Not a single post on your multi-threads, and I am still in the wrong.

I said something, I twisted your words. I said nothing, I actively downplaying legitimate issues and try to control narrative... how many times did you actually fell, head-first, when you're an infant? Pure curiosity.

Let me address your comments point by point and expose the inconsistencies and deflections in your narrative:

Your Role and Allegiance
You claim to operate selflessly, but who funds your activities? If you’re not paid by players, then it stands to reason that casinos, including Stake, are your backers. This inherent conflict of interest disqualifies you as an unbiased observer.

Your Ignoring Mechanism
Despite claiming to have me on ignore, you somehow manage to read my posts, respond selectively, and dismiss valid evidence. Either you’re using “ignore” as a hollow excuse, or you’re deliberately attempting to derail discussions that expose the truth about Stake and similar operations.

Omission of Evidence
You failed to include the thread “Stake.com’s Rigged House Games? Unmasking the Flawed Math Behind Their 'Fair'” in the case history despite its thorough statistical analysis. Instead of engaging with the evidence presented, you chose to focus on unrelated threads and dismissed legitimate concerns with condescension.

Your Deflection and Premature Judgments
You accused me of making "invalid" scam claims based on your biased perspective. However, the statistical data, gameplay patterns, and Stake's non-transparent practices speak for themselves. Dismissing detailed analysis as "invalid" without addressing the core issues reflects poorly on your integrity.

Unanswered Questions

If you’re truly neutral, why do you avoid adding critical threads to the case?
Why do you consistently downplay legitimate grievances while parroting casino narratives?
How do you sustain yourself while supposedly offering this service “for free”?
On Being Put on Ignore
Your response only solidifies my belief that you are yet another entity acting in bad faith, much like Casino Guru or Abhyroose. The mask you wear may be different, but the agenda remains the same—to protect casino interests at the expense of victims.

From this point forward, I will treat your involvement as what it is: an effort to derail and dismiss valid concerns for motives that are increasingly suspect. You are now on my ignore list. Don’t expect further engagement.