Quote from: KennyR on Today at 12:01:24 PM

Quote from: Yamifoud on Today at 11:38:19 AM

Alright, sometimes we might say a person's decision is right or wrong even without knowing the whole story, just like what OP is sharing. Some might say it was the right call, while others firmly disagree. If we were on the employee's side, we would take responsibility for our workers; we know how to appreciate them and when it's time to let someone go. It's not that easy to decide to fire someone over a simple issue but what I really think that happened could be more complicated than it seems, leading to firing him. Well, the court has made its decision, which means this is the final. So, even though it hurts, we must accept it.

The issue could've been getting around for some time period, and the employee might be noted for his activities. As stated, the firing isn't an immediate one. It looks like they've taken the necessary time and fired him at the right time. At some particular time of the day he might be gambling regularly. This seems to be the reason behind the firing. The authority could've gotten solid evidence and gone further if the employee raised a complaint. Anyhow, the firing of the employee is not because he used cryptocurrency for gambling. He gambled during the working hours, which is the right one.

We dont really know on whats the story behind it because we do know that they do make out immediate decision about firing up such employee but actually theres really that possibility at the moment that theyve known that a certain person is really that engaged with gambling activity. There will really be having those criticisms into this regard on which we know that trying out to get involved on what a certain person is doing or the activities that they are dealing with is really that against on someones privacy. We do know that when it comes into this aspect that we do have all the rights on what we do into our funds. If they do find out some potential problems in regarding about misuse or stolen up some funds into the bank then this is the right time that they should be firing him but if theres still none or having no problems then i dont see the reason on why they would be doing so.

They are really just that too assuming that there might be some possibility that things get worst specially if addiction will really be that becoming more worst as the time that they will really be that already touching up banks funds and thats why they do make out some action basing up on what they do have observed. Assuming that things might get worst then they do already made out such act on which we can say that its a bit harsh on such decision been made of.