Quote from: Dont Trust Verify on Today at 01:55:03 AM

o_l_e_o called ChipMixer low risk and secure.

He really got under your skin, didn't he? Bringing him up even a year after he's passed away.

Quote

You called Chipmixer better than coinjoin and repeated the time travel myth time and time again.

I always remember myself recommending coinjoin and Monero over to custodial mixers, and there's nothing in the quoted text that suggests otherwise. But, feel free to dig up the forum more and prove me wrong.

Quote

We know this is false because the KuCoin hacker reused the same deposit address and when they consolidated their chips we were able to see that in some cases they were just receiving the same coins they had just deposited.

My friend, I can also point out issues on coinjoin clients that said they were providing privacy when they actually weren't when the user did all sort of dumb decisions, like the KuCoin hacker. For example, I can also point you out to whirlpool user deliberately consolidating toxic change with private coins. It could also be very possible that WabiSabi coordinators have de-anonymized coinjoin in the past, abusing this recent reported vulnerability, with the user being completely unaware of the spying.

Please refrain from provoking me in a discussion about which client software has the highest number of incidents involving people being caught for "misusing" it.

This ongoing drama has to come to an end. Right now, it feels like you're trying to make me submit, just as others (including myself) have tried to make Kruw submit. I'll admit that I've said things in the past that were incorrect and have spread misinformation about WabiSabi (the protocol). Similarly, Kruw has said plenty of foolish things on this board, and I'm sure he's aware of it too.

I'm not asking anyone to forgive the things that have been said during this conflict; there have been plenty of unforgivable remarks from both sides. However, can we set aside our egos? Nothing good will come from continuing this. WabiSabi is an excellent protocol, and while the team is one big problem, it's open-source, meaning we can improve it. Bitcoin's need for privacy is more important than either side seeking "redemption".

What do you say?