Quote from: OmegaStarScream on Today at 08:48:34 AM

You should keep in mind that not all exchanges use the same KYT (Know your transaction) software. Some might use AMLBot, ChainAnalysis, or something else. And even then (and I'm guessing here) given that the "reports" are based on percentages and not just "suspicious" vs "non suspicious" I would imagine that not all exchanges have the same level of strictness.

So if AMLBot detects that your address is clean for example[1], another exchange might have other sources included and could find your address as dirty. Or, maybe both solutions detect that the funds are 40% from a gambling site or darknet, but then exchange A take that as "suspicious" and requires you to provide proof of funds while exchange B wouldn't.

Could you explain the type of transaction you're going to make? Is it simply fiat vs crypto? If so, maybe it's wiser to just use a proper P2P exchange. That way the other party is forced to deposit the funds into the exchange, and if there is something wrong with the funds, he should deal with the issue, not you.

[1] https://amlbot.com/attachment/AMLBot_report_example.pdf

My trading model is that I acquire clients’ crypto assets and then transfer these crypto assets to exchanges for fiat currency. I understand that different exchanges may use different AML systems or use multiple AML systems at the same time. What I have to do is to ensure that the funds I receive are compliant. I will not use only one exchange to exchange fiat currency. It is unwise to use only one exchange.