Quote from: Kirito89 on December 26, 2024, 07:41:55 PM

Quote from: holydarkness on December 26, 2024, 05:34:51 PM

Hey holydarkness, I'd like to address the "account deletion" part one more time for bitcointalk, cause OP is simply avoiding any rational conversation, due to his attempt of getting some money out of us.

So, an user, if they'd like to stop gambling on duckdice, they have 3 option, either a self-exclusion, that is like a temporarly ban, a self-ban which means his account is permanently banned, or a removal of GDRP consent, which basically means removing all data, email, ips, crypto transactions related to an account, as per legislations that we need to follow.
In OPs case, a removal of GDPR consent was the requirement by him, which means basically we erase all data linking him to an duckdice account.

At a certain point during this thread, OP showed a screenshot, showing an username( that's not in Duckdice's database anymore) with a bet, which means, server seed, client seed, nounce. While we can't link this certain server seed to an account, the seed still exists in our database, basically it means its a seed that was used at some point by any random player to gamble, in this case OP confirmed it was his. Using this seed we were able to verify the provably fairness of it, basically dismissing his false claim of "unreal streak that I came upon, losing a lot of btc, but I'm reporting it 1 year later".

Now on the blackmailing part. We've actually been dealing with this type of person or same person for that matter for years now on bitcointalk, Duckdice's biggest mistake was that a few years ago, they've decided its best to give him a low bonus and not having to deal with the constant negative spam he was doing on bitcointalk and trustpilot ( If anyone will check, my responses now are similar with the cases we had in the past, with a certain type of accusations). Thus this user is coming back mostly every year, trying to get something more out of Duckdice.

While OP claims this is random, and just a coincidence that someone is blackmail-ing us at the same time he started his bitcointalk campaign ( 1 year after the so called incident happened), he made 2 mistakes. 1. creating an email address for the blackmail emails that's literally the same as OP's email address ( there's 1 extra letter, and OP's email address is unique), the blackmailer in question would have no way of knowing what OP's email address is, so I suppose the blackmailer which is a different person than OP as he claims, somehow guessed OP's unique email address, and 2. The blackmailer actually states in his emails that he will remove all bitcointalk threads except! this one and the other OP has made. I assume if a impersonator would try and take advantage of OPs threads, he'd claim he'd delete these threads if he got the money, but in this case, the blackmailer is claiming he'll delete some of the 1-2-3 year old fake scam accusation threads that are already closed.

Now as OP will likely ignore this, and go sideways trying to push his narrative, for refference OP stated I'm trying to mislead people for claiming he lost 0.38 BTC instead of 0.37 BTC, I'll aswell stop responding to this thread, unless there's something actually relevant added to it.

Thank you for your objective support on this matter holydarkness and khaleed.

Kirito89,
Duckdice Support.

Your claims are becoming increasingly inconsistent and contradictory. Let’s clear up a few things:

Contradiction in Your Statements:
Initially, you claimed that the blackmail email came from an address identical to mine. Now, you’re saying it’s "the same email but with a few changes." Which is it? Changing your narrative like this only highlights your lack of credibility.

Timeline of Events:
I made my post here on November 29. According to the screenshot you provided earlier, the first blackmail email you received was on December 7. This clearly indicates that someone saw my post, created an email similar to my user name 'as shown on your Screenshot: https://imgur.com/a/OKAlIXC and tried to scam you. I immediately clarified when you posted the screenshot, stating not to pay anyone and that I was not behind those emails.

Confirmation from HolyDarkness:
I’ve already posted a screenshot where [b[HolyDarkness also confirmed that the scammer’s claims were invalid. Yet, despite this, you continue to accuse me baselessly, ignoring both my clarification and the acknowledgment from an impartial observer. https://imgur.com/a/Ir5qqAu [/b]

Your History of Paying Blackmailers:
I’m wondering why DuckDice.io is paying supposed blackmailers even when you claim to know they are blackmailers. For example, you admitted paying someone who claimed their bet was unfair, even though you said you believed it was fair. Doesn’t this seem suspicious? It looks like you paid them to prevent exposure of something more damaging. However, even after you paid, the unfairness of your practices eventually came to light. You can’t hide the truth forever.

Invest in Fairness Instead:
Instead of paying blackmailers to cover up your flaws, I recommend you focus on being fair. Use that money to address system failures and ensure transparency in your operations. This would not only improve your reputation but also prevent legitimate users from questioning your practices.

Deflecting from the Core Issue:
It’s evident that you’re using this fabricated blackmail narrative to divert attention from the real issue—my concerns about unfair betting outcomes and your refusal to provide transparent data. This is a blatant attempt to tarnish my credibility and distract readers from DuckDice.io’s questionable practices.